Literature DB >> 9125919

Characteristics of the informal curriculum and trainees' ethical choices.

E M Hundert, F Hafferty, D Christakis.   

Abstract

In October 1995, the Association of American Medical Colleges held its first Conference on Students' and Residents' Ethical and Professional Development. In a plenary session and break-out sessions, the 150 participants, representing a wide variety of medical and professional specialties and roles, discussed the factors and programs that affect medical trainees' development of ethical and professional standards of behavior. The main challenge of addressing students' professional development is the enormous range of influences on that development, many of which, such as the declines in civic responsibility and good manners throughout the United States, fall outside the scope of academic medicine. Nonetheless, many influences fall within reach of medical educators. In a pre-conference survey, participants ranked eight issues related to graduating ethical physicians. The respondents ranked highest the inadequacy of the understanding of how best to influence students' ethical development, followed by faculty use of dehumanizing coping mechanisms, and the "business" of medicine's taking precedence over academic goals. The plenary speakers discussed the "informal curriculum" and the "hidden curriculum" and the need for medical faculty to take seriously the great influence they have on students' and residents' moral and professional development as they become physicians. Whether consciously or not, medical education programs are producing physicians who do not meet the ethical standards the profession has traditionally expected its members to meet. In three series of break-out sessions, the participants analyzed the nature of the ethical dilemmas that medical students and residents face from virtually the first day of their training, the use of role playing in promoting ethical development, and ways to improve policies and overcome barriers to change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9125919     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199606000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  29 in total

Review 1.  Supporting the moral development of medical students.

Authors:  W T Branch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The white coat ceremony: a contemporary medical ritual.

Authors:  S J Huber
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics.

Authors:  Addeane S Caelleigh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Excellence in role modelling: insight and perspectives from the pros.

Authors:  Scott M Wright; Joseph A Carrese
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Strategies for effective on-call supervision for internal medicine residents: the superb/safety model.

Authors:  Jeanne M Farnan; Julie K Johnson; David O Meltzer; Ilene Harris; Holly J Humphrey; Alan Schwartz; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

6.  Use of critical incident reports in medical education. A perspective.

Authors:  William T Branch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The use of pejorative terms to describe patients: "Dirtball" revisited.

Authors:  Peter E Dans
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2002-01

Review 8.  A systematic review of teamwork training interventions in medical student and resident education.

Authors:  Chayan Chakraborti; Romsai T Boonyasai; Scott M Wright; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Professional and moral development in medical students: the ethics of caring for patients.

Authors:  W T Branch
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1998

Review 10.  The Hidden Curricula of Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Carlton Lawrence; Tsholofelo Mhlaba; Kearsley A Stewart; Relebohile Moletsane; Bernhard Gaede; Mosa Moshabela
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.