BACKGROUND: Supervision is central to resident education and patient safety, yet there is little published evidence to describe a framework for clinical supervision. The aim of this study was to describe supervision strategies for on-call internal medicine residents. METHODS: Between January and November 2006, internal medicine residents and attending physicians at a single hospital were interviewed within 1 week of their final call on the general medicine rotation. Appreciative inquiry and critical incident technique were used to elicit perspectives on ideal and suboptimal supervision practices. A representative portion of transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach to develop a coding scheme that was then applied to the entire set of transcripts. All discrepancies were resolved via discussion until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: Forty-four of 50 (88%) attending physicians and 46 of 50 (92%) eligible residents completed an interview. Qualitative analysis revealed a bidirectional model of suggested supervisory strategies, the "SUPERB/SAFETY" model; an interrater reliability of 0.70 was achieved. Suggestions for attending physicians providing supervision included setting expectations, recognizing uncertainty, planning communication, having easy availability, reassuring residents, balancing supervision, and having autonomy. Suggested resident strategies for seeking supervision from attending physicians included seeking input early, contacting for active clinical decisions or feeling uncertain, end of life issues, transitions in care, or help with systems issues. Common themes suggested by trainees and attending physicians included easy availability and preservation of resident decision-making autonomy. DISCUSSION: Residents and attending physicians have explicit expectations for optimal supervision. The SUPERB/SAFETY model of supervision may be an effective resource to enhance the clinical supervision of residents.
BACKGROUND: Supervision is central to resident education and patient safety, yet there is little published evidence to describe a framework for clinical supervision. The aim of this study was to describe supervision strategies for on-call internal medicine residents. METHODS: Between January and November 2006, internal medicine residents and attending physicians at a single hospital were interviewed within 1 week of their final call on the general medicine rotation. Appreciative inquiry and critical incident technique were used to elicit perspectives on ideal and suboptimal supervision practices. A representative portion of transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach to develop a coding scheme that was then applied to the entire set of transcripts. All discrepancies were resolved via discussion until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: Forty-four of 50 (88%) attending physicians and 46 of 50 (92%) eligible residents completed an interview. Qualitative analysis revealed a bidirectional model of suggested supervisory strategies, the "SUPERB/SAFETY" model; an interrater reliability of 0.70 was achieved. Suggestions for attending physicians providing supervision included setting expectations, recognizing uncertainty, planning communication, having easy availability, reassuring residents, balancing supervision, and having autonomy. Suggested resident strategies for seeking supervision from attending physicians included seeking input early, contacting for active clinical decisions or feeling uncertain, end of life issues, transitions in care, or help with systems issues. Common themes suggested by trainees and attending physicians included easy availability and preservation of resident decision-making autonomy. DISCUSSION: Residents and attending physicians have explicit expectations for optimal supervision. The SUPERB/SAFETY model of supervision may be an effective resource to enhance the clinical supervision of residents.
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Barrett T Kitch; Debra F Weinstein; Eric G Campbell; Matthew Hutter; Joel S Weissman Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005 Dec 12-26
Authors: Jamiu O Busari; Nielske M Weggelaar; Andrieke C Knottnerus; Petra-Marie Greidanus; Albert J J A Scherpbier Journal: Med Educ Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Roy Phitayakorn; Reed G Williams; Rachel Yudkowsky; Ilene B Harris; Linnea S Hauge; Warren D Widmann; Maura E Sullivan; John D Mellinger Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Eileen T McMyler; Paula T Ross; Kelly A Saran; Anabel Urteaga-Fuentes; Susan G Anderson; Richard C Boothman; Monica L Lypson Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2011-09
Authors: David N Hager; Pranav Chandrashekar; Robert W Bradsher; Ali M Abdel-Halim; Souvik Chatterjee; Melinda Sawyer; Roy G Brower; Dale M Needham Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 3.425