Literature DB >> 9119439

Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer. Can we afford to do this?

D A Ahlquist1.   

Abstract

Fecal blood is an inherently insensitive and nonspecific marker for asymptomatic colorectal neoplasia. As such, use of fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) necessarily limits the effectiveness and efficiency of a screening application. FOBT screening may result in a modest reduction in colorectal cancer-specific mortality, but it alters neither colorectal cancer incidence nor overall mortality. Costs resulting from FOBT screening are substantial, and the extent to which screen-induced mortality offsets any benefits remains unknown. In the absence of a clearly demonstrated net benefit with FOBT screening, affordability of this expensive effort can be legitimately questioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9119439     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8553(05)70282-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8553            Impact factor:   3.806


  15 in total

1.  Molecular stool screening for colorectal cancer. Using DNA markers may be beneficial, but large scale evaluation is needed.

Authors:  D A Ahlquist
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

2.  Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; S Moss; F Sufi; C M Mangham; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Population-based fecal occult blood screening for colon cancer: will the benefits outweigh the harm?

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Identification of phospholipid scramblase 1 as a biomarker and determination of its prognostic value for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yung-Bin Kuo; Chung-Chuan Chan; C Allen Chang; Chung-Wei Fan; Ray-Ping Hung; Ya-Shu Hung; Kuei-Tien Chen; Jau-Song Yu; Yu-Sun Chang; Err-Cheng Chan
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.354

5.  The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M F Kaminski; M Bretthauer; A G Zauber; E J Kuipers; H-O Adami; M van Ballegooijen; J Regula; M van Leerdam; T Stefansson; L Påhlman; E Dekker; M A Hernán; K Garborg; G Hoff
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Faecal calprotectin and faecal occult blood tests in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and adenoma.

Authors:  J Tibble; G Sigthorsson; R Foster; R Sherwood; M Fagerhol; I Bjarnason
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Differential secreted proteome approach in murine model for candidate biomarker discovery in colon cancer.

Authors:  Kannan Rangiah; Montri Tippornwong; Vineet Sangar; David Austin; Marie-Pier Tétreault; Anil K Rustgi; Ian A Blair; Kenneth H Yu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Immunohistochemical analysis revealed CD34 and Ki67 protein expression as significant prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Lei Ma; Jia-Yuan Peng; Peng Zhang; Wei-Jie Liu; Long Huang; Huan-Long Qin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  False negative fecal occult blood test may be associated with increased mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Half; Liat Mlynarsky; Timna Naftali; Fabiana Benjaminov; Fred M Konikoff
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Intraurban influences on physician colorectal cancer screening practices.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Alfred R Ashford; Rafael Lantigua; Farida Hajiani; Rebeca Franco; Julia E Heck; Donald Gemson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.