Literature DB >> 9118928

Reassessing benzene risks using internal doses and Monte-Carlo uncertainty analysis.

L A Cox1.   

Abstract

Human cancer risks from benzene have been estimated from epidemiological data, with supporting evidence from animal bioassay data. This article reexamines the animal-based risk assessments using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of benzene metabolism in animals and humans. Internal doses (total benzene metabolites) from oral gavage experiments in mice are well predicted by the PBPK model. Both the data and the PBPK model outputs are also well described by a simple nonlinear (Michaelis-Menten) regression model, as previously used by Bailer and Hoel [Metabolite-based internal doses used in risk assessment of benzene. Environ Health Perspect 82:177-184 (1989)]. Refitting the multistage model family to internal doses changes the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) dose-response curve for mice from linear-quadratic to purely cubic, so that low-dose risk estimates are smaller than in previous risk assessments. In contrast to Bailer and Hoel's findings using interspecies dose conversion, the use of internal dose estimates for humans from a PBPK model reduces estimated human risks at low doses. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the finding of a nonlinear MLE dose-response curve at low doses is robust to changes in internal dose definitions and more consistent with epidemiological data than earlier risk models. A Monte-Carlo uncertainty analysis based on maximum-entropy probabilities and Bayesian conditioning is used to develop an entire probability distribution for the true but unknown dose-response function. This allows the probability of a positive low-dose slope to be quantified: It is about 10%. An upper 95% confidence limit on the low-dose slope of excess risk is also obtained directly from the posterior distribution and is similar to previous q1* values. This approach suggests that the excess risk due to benzene exposure may be nonexistent (or even negative) at sufficiently low doses. Two types of biological information about benzene effects--pharmacokinetic and hematotoxic--are examined to test the plausibility of this finding. A framework for incorporating causally relevant biological information into benzene risk assessment is introduced, and it is shown that both pharmacokinetic and hematotoxic models appear to be consistent with the hypothesis that sufficiently low concentrations of inhaled benzene do not create and excess risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9118928      PMCID: PMC1469746          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.961041413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  13 in total

1.  Modeling benzene pharmacokinetics across three sets of animal data: parametric sensitivity and risk implications.

Authors:  R C Spear; F Y Bois; T Woodruff; D Auslander; J Parker; S Selvin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Pharmacokinetics of benzene.

Authors:  C C Travis; J L Quillen; A D Arms
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  An exact analysis of the multistage model explaining dose-response concavity.

Authors:  L A Cox
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  A comparison of test statistics for assessing the effects of concomitant variables in survival analysis.

Authors:  K L Lee; F E Harrell; H D Tolley; R A Rosati
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Acute and chronic dose/response effect of benzene inhalation on the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and spleen cells of CD-1 male mice.

Authors:  J D Green; C A Snyder; J LoBue; B D Goldstein; R E Albert
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1981-06-30       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  A physiological model for simulation of benzene metabolism by rats and mice.

Authors:  M A Medinsky; P J Sabourin; G Lucier; L S Birnbaum; R F Henderson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  The effect of exposure regimen and duration on benzene-induced bone-marrow damage in mice. I. Sex comparison in DBA/2 mice.

Authors:  C A Luke; R R Tice; R T Drew
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  A mathematical model of canine granulocytopoiesis.

Authors:  K H Steinbach; H Raffler; G Pabst; T M Fliedner
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Metabolite-based internal doses used in a risk assessment of benzene.

Authors:  A J Bailer; D G Hoel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The effect of dose, dose rate, route of administration, and species on tissue and blood levels of benzene metabolites.

Authors:  R F Henderson; P J Sabourin; W E Bechtold; W C Griffith; M A Medinsky; L S Birnbaum; G W Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Whole body pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Ivan Nestorov
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Preparatory activations across a distributed cortical network determine production of express saccades in humans.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Kara A Dyckman; Lauren E Ethridge; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Use of probabilistic modeling within a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict sulfamethazine residue withdrawal times in edible tissues in swine.

Authors:  Jennifer Buur; Ronald Baynes; Geof Smith; Jim Riviere
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A probabilistic assessment of the impact of interventions on oncology nurses' exposure to antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  T Meijster; W Fransman; J van Hemmen; H Kromhout; D Heederik; E Tielemans
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Event-related potential and time-frequency endophenotypes for schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Lauren E Ethridge; Jordan P Hamm; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Abnormalities of neuronal oscillations and temporal integration to low- and high-frequency auditory stimulation in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Casey S Gilmore; Natalie A M Picchetti; Scott R Sponheim; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Spatiotemporal and frequency domain analysis of auditory paired stimuli processing in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; John R Shapiro; Michael C Stevens; Nashaat N Boutros; Ann T Summerfelt; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Godfrey Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Gunvant Thaker; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Family history of psychosis moderates early auditory cortical response abnormalities in non-psychotic bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; John R Shapiro; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant K Thaker; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.744

9.  Neural activations during auditory oddball processing discriminating schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Lauren E Ethridge; Jordan P Hamm; John R Shapiro; Ann T Summerfelt; Sarah K Keedy; Michael C Stevens; Godfrey Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Nash N Boutros; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant Thaker; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  The contribution of benzene to smoking-induced leukemia.

Authors:  J E Korte; I Hertz-Picciotto; M R Schulz; L M Ball; E J Duell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.