BACKGROUND: Reduced amplitude of the P300 event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may characterize schizophrenia (SZ) but is also reported in bipolar disorder. Similarity of auditory processing abnormalities between these diagnoses is uncertain, given the frequent combination of both psychotic and nonpsychotic patients in bipolar samples; abnormalities may be restricted to psychosis. In addition, typically only latency and amplitude of brain responses at selected sensors and singular time points are used to characterize neural responses. Comprehensive quantification of brain activations involving both spatiotemporal and time-frequency analyses could better identify unique auditory oddball responses among patients with different psychotic disorders. METHODS: Sixty SZ, 60 bipolar I with psychosis (BPP), and 60 healthy subjects (H) were compared on neural responses during an auditory oddball task using multisensor electroencephalography. Principal components analysis was used to reduce multisensor data before evaluating group differences on voltage and frequency of neural responses over time. RESULTS: Linear discriminant analysis revealed five variables that best differentiated groups: 1) late beta activity to standard stimuli; 2) late beta/gamma activity to targets discriminated BPP from other groups; 3) midlatency theta/alpha activity to standards; 4) target-related voltage at the late N2 response discriminated both psychosis groups from H; and 5) target-related voltage during early N2 discriminated BPP from H. CONCLUSIONS: Although the P300 significantly differentiated psychotic groups from H, it did not uniquely discriminate groups beyond the above variables. No variable uniquely discriminated SZ, perhaps indicating utility of this task for studying psychosis-associated neurophysiology generally and BPP specifically.
BACKGROUND: Reduced amplitude of the P300event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may characterize schizophrenia (SZ) but is also reported in bipolar disorder. Similarity of auditory processing abnormalities between these diagnoses is uncertain, given the frequent combination of both psychotic and nonpsychoticpatients in bipolar samples; abnormalities may be restricted to psychosis. In addition, typically only latency and amplitude of brain responses at selected sensors and singular time points are used to characterize neural responses. Comprehensive quantification of brain activations involving both spatiotemporal and time-frequency analyses could better identify unique auditory oddball responses among patients with different psychotic disorders. METHODS: Sixty SZ, 60 bipolar I with psychosis (BPP), and 60 healthy subjects (H) were compared on neural responses during an auditory oddball task using multisensor electroencephalography. Principal components analysis was used to reduce multisensor data before evaluating group differences on voltage and frequency of neural responses over time. RESULTS: Linear discriminant analysis revealed five variables that best differentiated groups: 1) late beta activity to standard stimuli; 2) late beta/gamma activity to targets discriminated BPP from other groups; 3) midlatency theta/alpha activity to standards; 4) target-related voltage at the late N2 response discriminated both psychosis groups from H; and 5) target-related voltage during early N2 discriminated BPP from H. CONCLUSIONS: Although the P300 significantly differentiated psychotic groups from H, it did not uniquely discriminate groups beyond the above variables. No variable uniquely discriminated SZ, perhaps indicating utility of this task for studying psychosis-associated neurophysiology generally and BPP specifically.
Authors: Yuri Koh; Kyung Soon Shin; June Sic Kim; Jung-Seok Choi; Do-Hyung Kang; Joon Hwan Jang; Kwang-Hyun Cho; Brian F O'Donnell; Chun Kee Chung; Jun Soo Kwon Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Daniel H Mathalon; Ralph E Hoffman; Todd D Watson; Ryan M Miller; Brian J Roach; Judith M Ford Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: K L Coburn; S D Shillcutt; K A Tucker; K M Estes; F B Brin; P Merai; N C Moore Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1998-09-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Patricia E G Bestelmeyer; Louise H Phillips; Caroline Crombie; Philip Benson; David St Clair Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: J Tilak Ratnanather; Clare B Poynton; Dominic V Pisano; Britni Crocker; Elizabeth Postell; Shannon Cebron; Elvan Ceyhan; Nancy A Honeycutt; Pamela B Mahon; Patrick E Barta Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Lauren E Ethridge; Jordan P Hamm; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Brett A Clementz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: M I Atagün; E M Şıkoğlu; S S Can; G Karakaş-Uğurlu; S Ulusoy-Kaymak; A Çayköylü; O Algın; M L Phillips; C M Moore; D Öngür Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Elena I Ivleva; Amanda F Moates; Jordan P Hamm; Ira H Bernstein; Hugh B O'Neill; Darwynn Cole; Brett A Clementz; Gunvant K Thaker; Carol A Tamminga Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; Nashaat N Boutros; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Brett A Clementz Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; John R Shapiro; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant K Thaker; Brett A Clementz Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 6.744