Literature DB >> 9110204

Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding.

T H Meuwissen1.   

Abstract

A method was derived that maximizes the genetic level of selected animals while constraining their average coancestry to a predefined value. The average coancestry of the selected parents equals the inbreeding level in the next generation, so that rates of inbreeding were controlled. When this method was applied for several generations of selection, stable rates of genetic gain were attained, which indicates that the method could control the short- and long-term effects of selection on inbreeding. At equal rates of inbreeding, genetic gains were 21 to 60% greater than that with selection for BLUP-EBV, because of increased selection differentials. The difference was larger when the desirable rate of inbreeding was smallest. Selection with a constraint on inbreeding required only EBV of, and relationships between, the selection candidates and is therefore easy to apply in practice. The optimal solution is expressed in genetic contributions of selection candidates to the next generation, which is equivalent to numbers of offspring per candidate. These optimal numbers of offspring may be difficult to attain because of female reproductive limitations. The optimal method could be adapted to situations with additional reproductive constraints. The method can also be used to constrain the variance of response by restricting the average prediction error variance of the selected animals.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9110204     DOI: 10.2527/1997.754934x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  99 in total

1.  Expected genetic contributions and their impact on gene flow and genetic gain.

Authors:  J A Woolliams; P Bijma; B Villanueva
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding.

Authors:  O Rosvall; T J Mullin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Impact of nonrandom mating on genetic variance and gene flow in populations with mass selection.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sánchez; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Improving the efficiency of artificial selection: more selection pressure with less inbreeding.

Authors:  L Sanchez; M A Toro; C García
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Zuo Li; Guozheng Liu; Yong Jiang; Hans Peter Maurer; Tobias Würschum; Hans-Peter Mock; Andrea Matros; Erhard Ebmeyer; Ralf Schachschneider; Ebrahim Kazman; Johannes Schacht; Manje Gowda; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Positive assortative mating with family size as a function of predicted parental breeding values.

Authors:  M Lstiburek; T J Mullin; T F C Mackay; D Huber; B Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.

Authors:  Pieter A Oliehoek; Jack J Windig; Johan A M van Arendonk; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Management of subdivided populations in conservation programs: development of a novel dynamic system.

Authors:  J Fernández; M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Optimum contribution selection in large general tree breeding populations with an application to Scots pine.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.