Literature DB >> 12851766

Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding.

O Rosvall1, T J Mullin.   

Abstract

Selection and mating principles in a closed breeding population (BP) were studied by computer simulation. The BP was advanced, either by random assortment of mates (RAM), or by positive assortative mating (PAM). Selection was done with high precision using clonal testing. Selection considered both genetic gain and gene diversity by "group-merit selection", i.e. selection for breeding value weighted by group coancestry of the selected individuals. A range of weights on group coancestry was applied during selection to vary parent contributions and thereby adjust the balance between gain and diversity. This resulted in a series of scenarios with low to high effective population sizes measured by status effective number. Production populations (PP) were selected only for gain, as a subset of the BP. PAM improved gain in the PP substantially, by increasing the additive variance (i.e. the gain potential) of the BP. This effect was more pronounced under restricted selection when parent contributions to the next generation were more balanced with within-family selection as the extreme, i.e. when a higher status effective number was maintained in the BP. In that case, the additional gain over the BP mean for the clone PP and seed PPs was 32 and 84% higher, respectively, for PAM than for RAM in generation 5. PAM did not reduce gene diversity of the BP but increased inbreeding, and in that way caused a departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The effect of inbreeding was eliminated by recombination during the production of seed orchard progeny. Also, for a given level of inbreeding in the seed orchard progeny or in a mixture of genotypes selected for clonal deployment, gain was higher for PAM than for RAM. After including inbreeding depression in the simulation, inbreeding was counteracted by selection, and the enhancement of PAM on production population gain was slightly reduced. In the presence of inbreeding depression the greatest PP gain was achieved at still higher levels of status effective number, i.e. when more gene diversity was conserved in the BP. Thus, the combination of precise selection and PAM resulted in close to maximal short-term PP gain, while conserving maximal gene diversity in the BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851766     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1318-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  26 in total

1.  The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Effect on linkage disequilibrium of selection for a quantitative character with epistasis.

Authors:  J P Mueller; J W James
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Predicting cumulated response to directional selection in finite panmictic populations.

Authors:  E Verrier; J J Colleau; J L Foulley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Multiple-population versus hierarchical conifer breeding programs: a comparison of genetic diversity levels.

Authors:  C G Williams; J L Hamrick; P O Lewis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Effective size and F-statistics of subdivided populations. I. Monoecious species with partial selfing.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Assortative mating and artificial selection: a second appraisal.

Authors:  S Smith; K Hammond
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Asymptotic rates of response from forest tree breeding strategies using best linear unbiased prediction.

Authors:  R J Kerr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  The effect of assortative mating on the genetic composition of a population.

Authors:  J F Crow; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Eugen Q       Date:  1968-06

10.  F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  5 in total

1.  Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assortative mating: II. Unequal distribution of testing effort.

Authors:  M Lstibůrek; T J Mullin; D Lindgren; O Rosvall
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Positive assortative mating with family size as a function of predicted parental breeding values.

Authors:  M Lstiburek; T J Mullin; T F C Mackay; D Huber; B Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assortative mating: I. Equal distribution of testing efforts.

Authors:  M Lstibůrek; T J Mullin; D Lindgren; O Rosvall
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Assortative mating and gene flow generate clinal phenological variation in trees.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Soularue; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.797

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.