Literature DB >> 10049926

Improving the efficiency of artificial selection: more selection pressure with less inbreeding.

L Sanchez1, M A Toro, C García.   

Abstract

The use of population genetic variability in present-day selection schemes can be improved to reduce inbreeding rate and inbreeding depression without impairing genetic progress. We performed an experiment with Drosophila melanogaster to test mate selection, an optimizing method that uses linear programming to maximize the selection differential applied while at the same time respecting a restriction on the increase in inbreeding expected in the next generation. Previous studies about mate selection used computer simulation on simple additive genetic models, and no experiment with a real character in a real population had been carried out. After six selection generations, the optimized lines showed an increase in cumulated phenotypic selection differential of 10.76%, and at the same time, a reduction of 19.91 and 60.47% in inbreeding coefficient mean and variance, respectively. The increased selection pressure would bring greater selection response, and in fact, the observed change in the selected trait was on average 31.03% greater in the optimized lines. These improvements in the selection scheme were not made at the expense of the long-term expectations of genetic variability in the population, as these expectations were very similar for both mate selection and conventionally selected lines in our experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10049926      PMCID: PMC1460543     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding.

Authors:  M Quinton; C Smith; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference.

Authors:  C P Van Tassell; L D Van Vleck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.

Authors:  G M Belonsky; B W Kennedy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Selecting mating pairs with linear programming techniques.

Authors:  G B Jansen; J W Wilton
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effective size of populations under selection.

Authors:  E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding.

Authors:  M Quinton; C Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  A simple method for increasing the response to artificial selection.

Authors:  M A Toro; B M Nieto
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females.

Authors:  M R Rose; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; E Beecham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Impact of nonrandom mating on genetic variance and gene flow in populations with mass selection.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sánchez; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Long-term genomic selection for heterosis without dominance in multiplicative traits: case study of bunch production in oil palm.

Authors:  David Cros; Marie Denis; Jean-Marc Bouvet; Leopoldo Sánchez
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Artificial selection increased body weight but induced increase of runs of homozygosity in Hanwoo cattle.

Authors:  Kwondo Kim; Jaehoon Jung; Kelsey Caetano-Anollés; Samsun Sung; DongAhn Yoo; Bong-Hwan Choi; Hyung-Chul Kim; Jin-Young Jeong; Yong-Min Cho; Eung-Woo Park; Tae-Jeong Choi; Byoungho Park; Dajeong Lim; Heebal Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.