Literature DB >> 9105350

A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.

D A Roth1, A K Gosain, J G McCarthy, M A Stracher, D R Lefton, B H Grayson.   

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis has become an accepted method of treatment for patients requiring reconstruction of hypoplastic mandibles. We present a quantitative analysis of volumetric changes after distraction osteogenesis in a series of 10 patients. Group I (n = 5 patients, 3 unilateral craniofacial microsomia, 1 Goldenhaar syndrome, and 1 bilateral craniofacial microsomia) underwent unilateral distraction of the mandible. Group II (n = 5 patients, 1 Nager syndrome, 1 bilateral craniofacial microsomia, 1 developmental micrognathia, and 2 Treacher Collins syndrome) underwent bilateral distraction of the mandible. Predistraction and postdistraction axial and three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) scans were digitized and transferred to a computer for analysis with image-processing software to determine the changes in volume of the mandible and bony regenerate. The CT-derived volume method was validated by scanning three dry cadaver mandible specimens and comparing the volume data with those derived from a water-displacement method. The difference between the two methods was less than 5 percent. The mean distracted length, as recorded from the calibrated device, was 22.6 mm in the 10 patients. In the unilateral distraction group, the mean increase in hemimandibular bone volume was 2.8 cc, with a mean percentage increase of 27 percent in the distracted hemimandible. In the bilaterally distracted patients, the mean increase in total mandibular volume was 7.9 cc, with a mean percentage increase in bone volume of 25 percent. This study represents the first attempt to quantify the increase in bone volume resulting from distraction osteogenesis. Quantitative volumetric analysis of CT scans is an accurate method to measure the amount of bone regenerate in patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis of the mandible or the extremities. The concept and utility of quantifying the volumetric changes in bone following distraction osteogenesis may become more important as multiplanar devices are developed and used in other areas of the craniofacial skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9105350     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199704001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of Mandibular Distraction Regenerate Using Ultrasonography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jitender Dabas; Sujata Mohanty; Zainab Chaudhary; Amita Rani
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  Craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie Heike
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Three-dimensional imaging of soft and hard facial tissues in patients with craniofacial syndromes: a systematic review of methodological quality.

Authors:  Arianne Lewyllie; Maria Cadenas De Llano-Pérula; Anna Verdonck; Guy Willems
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes After Sinus Floor Augmentation with Mineralized Cortical Bone Allograft.

Authors:  Antoine Berberi; Lea Bouserhal; Nabih Nader; Rita Bou Assaf; Nayla Bassil Nassif; Joseph Bouserhal; Ziad Salameh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-12-24

5.  To determine the efficacy of ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone fill at the regenerate site for mandibular distraction osteogenesis over clinical and radiographic assessment- An in vivo prospective study.

Authors:  Neelam Andrade; Neha Aggrawal; Guruprasad Jadhav; Vyankatesh Sahu; Paul C Mathai
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-04-20

6.  Comparative Volume Analysis of Alveolar Defects by 3D Simulation.

Authors:  Pang-Yun Chou; Rafael Denadai; Rami R Hallac; Sarayuth Dumrongwongsiri; Wei-Chuan Hsieh; Betty Cj Pai; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.