Literature DB >> 29892528

To determine the efficacy of ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone fill at the regenerate site for mandibular distraction osteogenesis over clinical and radiographic assessment- An in vivo prospective study.

Neelam Andrade1, Neha Aggrawal1, Guruprasad Jadhav1, Vyankatesh Sahu1, Paul C Mathai1.   

Abstract

Until date conventional radiographs and computed tomography are the preferred diagnostic modalities to monitor the distraction osteogenesis regenerate. But these techniques do not detect the ongoing osteogenic process; moreover they obligate the patient to serial radiation exposure. In addition, anatomic overlap and metal artifacts obscure the virtual findings. In contrast, ultrasound is a noninvasive, efficient and an inexpensive way to evaluate bone healing. This study was conducted to test the efficacy of ultrasound in evaluating bone healing at the mandibular distraction site. Twenty patients underwent mandibular distraction. The wounds were assessed with an orthopantomograph and an ultrasound at the end of latency, mid distraction, end of distraction and post distraction periods i.e. 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 4months. Estimates of bone formation, using a semiquantitative radiological, ultrasonographic and intraoperative surgical bone fill scores were made. The correlation between intraoperative and ultrasonographic bone fill scores was statistically significant at 0.602, a total of 26 of the 31 sites correlated. Corresponding correlation between intraoperative and radiographic bone fill scores was 0.332, and only 13 of the 31 sites correlated. The results indicate that ultrasound is potentially an accurate noninvasive technique that is most useful in assessing the mandibular distraction regenerate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distraction osteogenesis; Ultrasonography

Year:  2018        PMID: 29892528      PMCID: PMC5993509          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction wound by computed tomography.

Authors:  C E Zimmermann; G Harris; P Thurmüller; M J Troulis; D H Perrott; B Rahn; L B Kaban
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Ultrasonographic monitoring of limb lengthening.

Authors:  N Maffulli; T Hughes; J A Fixsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-01

3.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography.

Authors:  M J Ciarelli; S A Goldstein; J L Kuhn; D D Cody; M B Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Sonographic evaluation of bone production at the distraction site in Ilizarov limb-lengthening procedures.

Authors:  J W Young; I S Kostrubiak; C S Resnik; D Paley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  D A Roth; A K Gosain; J G McCarthy; M A Stracher; D R Lefton; B H Grayson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Trabecular bone density in the proximal femur: quantitative CT assessment. Work in progress.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; M André; C S Resnik; D Resnick; C Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Radiographic imaging for Ilizarov limb lengthening in children.

Authors:  C E Blane; J E Herzenberg; M A DiPietro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

9.  X-ray diagnosis of healing fractures in rabbits.

Authors:  P J Nicholls; E Berg; F E Bliven; J M Kling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A role for ultrasound in limb lengthening.

Authors:  N D Derbyshire; A H Simpson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 2.  The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Ze Liu; Hongbin Guo; Jieyu Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.