Literature DB >> 9105342

A comparison of gait with solid, dynamic, and no ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

S A Radtka1, S R Skinner, D M Dixon, M E Johanson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study compared the effects of dynamic ankle-foot orthoses (DAFOs) with a plantar-flexion stop, polypropylene solid ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs), and no AFOs on the gait of children with cerebral palsy (CP). These orthoses were used to reduce the excessive ankle plantar flexion during the stance phase of gait. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten children with spastic CP (6 with diplegia and 4 with hemiplegia) were tested after wearing no AFOs for an initial 2-week period, solid AFOs for 1 month, no AFOs for an additional 2 weeks, and DAFOs for 1 month. The effects of the two orthoses and no AFOs on lower-extremity muscle timing, joint motions, and temporal-distance characteristics were compared.
RESULTS: Both orthoses increased stride length, decreased cadence, and reduced excessive ankle plantar flexion when compared with no orthoses. No differences were found for the gait variables when comparing the two orthoses. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Based on the data, the authors believe that although both orthoses would be recommended for children with spastic CP and excessive ankle plantar flexion during stance, additional individual factors should be considered when selecting either orthosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9105342     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/77.4.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  9 in total

1.  The effects of ankle foot orthoses on energy recovery and work during gait in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Bradford C Bennett; Shawn D Russell; Mark F Abel
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  [Bilateral spastic cerebral palsy with ambulatory ability (diplegia): pathophysiology, state of the art of conservative and surgical treatment and rehabilitation].

Authors:  B Westhoff; D Bittersohl; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Spastic equinus foot].

Authors:  B Westhoff; K Weimann-Stahlschmidt; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Foot and ankle joint movements inside orthoses for children with spastic CP.

Authors:  Xue-Cheng Liu; David Embrey; Channing Tassone; Frederick Klingbeil; Carlos Marquez-Barrientos; Brenna Brandsma; Roger Lyon; Jeffrey Schwab; Sergey Tarima; John Thometz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The effect of community-prescribed ankle-foot orthoses on gait parameters in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Shlomo Hayek; Yoram Hemo; Sam Chamis; Reuven Bat; Eitan Segev; Shlomo Wientroub; Ziva Yzhar
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Effects of Hinged versus Floor-Reaction Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Standing Stability and Sit-to-Stand Performance in Children with Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Wang; Wen-Chou Chi; Chiung-Ling Chen; Cheng-Hsieh Yang; Ya-Ling Teng; Kwok-Tak Yeung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Efficacy of conservative treatment for spastic cerebral palsy children with equinus gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Krongkaew Klaewkasikum; Tanyaporn Patathong; Patarawan Woratanarat; Thira Woratanarat; Kunlawat Thadanipon; Sasivimol Rattanasiri; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  The impacts of hinged and solid ankle-foot orthoses on standing and walking in children with spastic diplegia.

Authors:  Hamid Dalvand; Leila Dehghan; Awat Feizi; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Susan Amirsalari
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2013

9.  Do research papers provide enough information on design and material used in ankle foot orthoses for children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review.

Authors:  N Eddison; M Mulholland; N Chockalingam
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.