Literature DB >> 22018422

The effects of ankle foot orthoses on energy recovery and work during gait in children with cerebral palsy.

Bradford C Bennett1, Shawn D Russell, Mark F Abel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that 50% of children with cerebral palsy are prescribed ankle foot orthoses. One of the aims of ankle foot orthosis use is to aid in walking. This research examined the effects that ankle foot orthoses have on the energy recovery and the mechanical work performed by children with cerebral palsy during walking.
METHODS: Twenty-one children with spastic diplegia walked with and without their prescribed bilateral ankle foot orthoses. Ten of the subjects wore articulated (hinged) orthoses and 11 subjects wore solid orthoses. Three dimensional kinematic data were collected and between and within group repeated measures ANOVAs were applied to the dependent measures.
FINDINGS: The results were similar for both groups. There was an increase in stride length, energy recovery, and potential energy and the kinetic energy variation. There was no change in the mechanical work performed to walk or the normalized center of mass vertical excursion. Unfortunately, the increase in energy recovery did not alter the external work, as it was offset by increased variation in the potential and kinetic energies of the center of mass. There was a great deal of variability in the measured work, with both large increases and decreases in the work of individual subjects when wearing orthoses.
INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that current ankle foot orthoses can reduce the work to walk, but do not do so for many children with cerebral palsy. This research suggests that ankle foot orthosis prescription could be aided by measuring the mechanical work during walking.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018422      PMCID: PMC3267875          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  27 in total

1.  The 3-D motion of the centre of gravity of the human body during level walking. II. Lower limb amputees.

Authors:  L Tesio; D Lanzi; C Detrembleur
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Energy expenditure of diplegic ambulation using flexible plastic ankle foot orthoses.

Authors:  N Suzuki; T Shinohara; M Kimizuka; K Yamaguchi; K Mita
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2000

3.  Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on spatiotemporal parameters and energy cost of hemiparetic gait.

Authors:  Marco Franceschini; Maurizio Massucci; Luciana Ferrari; Maurizio Agosti; Chiara Paroli
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.477

4.  Motion of the body centre of gravity as a summary indicator of the mechanics of human pathological gait.

Authors:  C Detrembleur; A van den Hecke; F Dierick
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Biomechanical and electromyographic evaluation of ankle foot orthosis and dynamic ankle foot orthosis in spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  W K Lam; J C Y Leong; Y H Li; Y Hu; W W Lu
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Use of orthoses lowers the O(2) cost of walking in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  D Maltais; O Bar-Or; V Galea; M Pierrynowski
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Gait assessment of fixed ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic diplegia.

Authors:  M F Abel; G A Juhl; C L Vaughan; D L Damiano
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Ankle-foot orthoses: effect on gait in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Erbil Dursun; Nigar Dursun; Duygu Alican
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Body segment mass, radius and radius of gyration proportions of children.

Authors:  R K Jensen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Comparison of three ankle-foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic diplegia.

Authors:  Cathleen E Buckon; Susan Sienko Thomas; Sabrina Jakobson-Huston; Michael Moor; Michael Sussman; Michael Aiona
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effects of an articulated ankle-foot orthosis with resistance-adjustable joints on lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics during gait in individuals post-stroke.

Authors:  Toshiki Kobayashi; Michael S Orendurff; Grace Hunt; Fan Gao; Nicholas LeCursi; Lucas S Lincoln; K Bo Foreman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Relationship between ankle function and walking ability for children and young adults with cerebral palsy: A systematic review of deficits and targeted interventions.

Authors:  Benjamin C Conner; Nushka M Remec; Cassidy M Michaels; Chase W Wallace; Emily Andrisevic; Zachary F Lerner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 3.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing Studies for Producing Customized Ankle-Foot Orthoses.

Authors:  Rui Silva; António Veloso; Nuno Alves; Cristiana Fernandes; Pedro Morouço
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Are results after single-event multilevel surgery in cerebral palsy durable?

Authors:  Erich Rutz; Richard Baker; Oren Tirosh; Reinald Brunner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of children with joint angles in spastic diplegia with those of normal children.

Authors:  Chang Ju Kim; Young Mi Kim; Dong Dae Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-09-17

6.  Do research papers provide enough information on design and material used in ankle foot orthoses for children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review.

Authors:  N Eddison; M Mulholland; N Chockalingam
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.