Literature DB >> 9104715

A comparative prospective clinical study of two single-tooth implants: a preliminary report of 102 implants.

P Kemppainen1, S Eskola, P Ylipaavalniemi.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Treatment of tooth loss in the anterior maxilla can involve difficult functional, esthetic, and psychologic problems, especially in young patients with otherwise good dentition.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide a preliminary comparative evaluation of two implants (ITI and Astra) in single-tooth restorations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study of 102 single-tooth replacements with 56 ITI and 46 Astra dental implants was performed in 82 patients at the Finnish Student Health Service Foundation. One Astra implant was lost before loading. The overall survival rate of the implants was 97.8% for Astra implants and 100% for the ITI system. After the initial healing period of at least 6 months, the remaining 101 implants (56 ITI, 45 Astra) were free of periimplant infection and revealed no detectable mobility. Radiographs did not reveal signs of periimplant radiolucencies. All 101 implants received single-tooth crowns.
RESULTS: Periimplant parameters and acceptable implant function were examined and demonstrated satisfactory results with preestablished clinical parameters and radiographs at 1 year. During the observation time the mean marginal bone loss was 0.13 mm with Astra implants and 0.11 mm with ITI implants. Subjectively all patients were satisfied with their single-tooth restorations supported by either ITI or Astra dental implants.
CONCLUSION: The favorable results of this short-term study support the application of the two implant systems for single-tooth restorations, especially in the anterior region of the maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9104715     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70163-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  7 in total

Review 1.  Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Anders Palmquist; Omar M Omar; Marco Esposito; Jukka Lausmaa; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Randomised study for the 1-year crestal bone maintenance around modified diameter implants with different loading protocols: a radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Pietro Tortora; Alessandro Quaranta; Vittoria Perrotti; Iole Vozza; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Cumulative survival rate of Astra Tech implants: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jung-Soo Kim; Joo-Yeon Sohn; Jung-Chul Park; Ui-Won Jung; Chang-Sung Kim; Jae-Hoon Lee; June-Sung Shim; Keun-Woo Lee; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 4.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Yasmin Ardebili; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-10

5.  The Effect of Flapless and Full-thickness Flap Techniques on Implant Stability During the Healing Period.

Authors:  Mohammed Jasim Al-Juboori; Shafluzan Bin AbdulRahaman
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

6.  Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Byeong-Dae Ko; KeunBaDa Son; Seok Hyon Kang; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  The effect of implant-abutment connections on peri-implant bone levels around single implants in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroliene M Meijndert; Gerry M Raghoebar; Arjan Vissink; Konstantina Delli; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.