Literature DB >> 20591849

Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome.

Anders Palmquist1, Omar M Omar, Marco Esposito, Jukka Lausmaa, Peter Thomsen.   

Abstract

Bone-anchored titanium implants have revolutionized oral healthcare. Surface properties of oral titanium implants play decisive roles for molecular interactions, cellular response and bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the role of specific surface properties, such as chemical and phase composition and nanoscale features, for the biological in vivo performance remains to be established. Partly, this is due to limited transfer of state-of-the-art preparation techniques to complex three-dimensional geometries, analytical tools and access to minute, intact interfacial layers. As judged by the available results of a few randomized clinical trials, there is no evidence that any particular type of oral implant has superior long-term success. Important insights into the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells, cell-cell communication at the interface and high-resolution imaging of the interface between the surface oxide and the biological host are prerequisites for the understanding of the mechanisms of osseointegration. Strategies for development of the next generation of material surface modifications for compromised tissue are likely to include time and functionally programmed properties, pharmacological modulation and incorporation of cellular components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20591849      PMCID: PMC2952179          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0118.focus

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  79 in total

1.  One-year prospective three-center study comparing the outcome of a "soft bone implant" (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Brånemark implant.

Authors:  Bertil Friberg; Sven Jisander; Göran Widmark; AnnaKarin Lundgren; Carl-Johan Ivanoff; Lars Sennerby; Christina Thorén
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  A novel tool for high-resolution transmission electron microscopy of intact interfaces between bone and metallic implants.

Authors:  H Engqvist; G A Botton; M Couillard; S Mohammadi; J Malmström; L Emanuelsson; L Hermansson; M W Phaneuf; P Thomsen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Andreas Stavropoulos; Thorkild Karring; Lambros Kostopoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Biomechanical, histological, and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium alloy implants: a study in rabbit.

Authors:  Anders Palmquist; Fredrik Lindberg; Lena Emanuelsson; Rickard Brånemark; Håkan Engqvist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  A comparative prospective clinical study of two single-tooth implants: a preliminary report of 102 implants.

Authors:  P Kemppainen; S Eskola; P Ylipaavalniemi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

7.  SDF-1alpha/CXCR4-mediated migration of systemically transplanted bone marrow stromal cells towards ischemic brain lesion in a rat model.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Yubin Deng; Guang-Qian Zhou
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1.

Authors:  Daniel J Ceradini; Anita R Kulkarni; Matthew J Callaghan; Oren M Tepper; Nicholas Bastidas; Mark E Kleinman; Jennifer M Capla; Robert D Galiano; Jamie P Levine; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-07-04       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  The role of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) in osteoclast differentiation induced by receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand.

Authors:  Hidetaka Hayashi; Ken-ichi Nakahama; Takahiro Sato; Takehiko Tuchiya; Yasuyuki Asakawa; Toshimitu Maemura; Masanobu Tanaka; Mineto Morita; Ikuo Morita
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 10.  The use of simvastatin in bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jun-Beom Park
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2009-09-01
View more
  39 in total

1.  Scaling the heights--challenges in medical materials.

Authors:  Mohan Edirisinghe; Eleanor Stride
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Genetic networks in osseointegration.

Authors:  I Nishimura
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Bioinspired polydopamine and polyphenol tannic acid functionalized titanium suppress osteoclast differentiation: a facile and efficient strategy to regulate osteoclast activity at bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Chris Steffi; Zhilong Shi; Chee Hoe Kong; Wilson Wang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  The stimulation of adipose-derived stem cell differentiation and mineralization by ordered rod-like fluorapatite coatings.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Xiaodong Wang; Qiming Jin; Taocong Jin; Syweren Chang; Zhaocheng Zhang; Agata Czajka-Jakubowska; William V Giannobile; Jacques E Nör; Brian H Clarkson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Osseointegration of titanium implants functionalised with phosphoserine-tethered poly(epsilon-lysine) dendrons: a comparative study with traditional surface treatments in sheep.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger; Katja Nuss; Alexander Bürki; Isabel Mosch; Miché le Sidler; Steve T Meikle; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Matteo Santin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  The stability of BMP loaded polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings on titanium.

Authors:  Raphael Guillot; Flora Gilde; Pierre Becquart; Frédéric Sailhan; Aurélien Lapeyrere; Delphine Logeart-Avramoglou; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Extension of hydrophilicity stability by reactive plasma treatment and wet storage on TiO2 nanotube surfaces for biomedical implant applications.

Authors:  Marcel F Kunrath; André L M Vargas; Patrícia Sesterheim; Eduardo R Teixeira; Roberto Hubler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Assessment of a polyelectrolyte multilayer film coating loaded with BMP-2 on titanium and PEEK implants in the rabbit femoral condyle.

Authors:  R Guillot; I Pignot-Paintrand; J Lavaud; A Decambron; E Bourgeois; V Josserand; D Logeart-Avramoglou; E Viguier; C Picart
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Physicochemical Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation of Amorphous and Partially Crystalline Calcium Phosphate Coatings Fabricated on Ti-6Al-4V Implants by the Plasma Spray Method.

Authors:  Estevam A Bonfante; Lukasz Witek; Nick Tovar; Marcelo Suzuki; Charles Marin; Rodrigo Granato; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.