Literature DB >> 1559092

Workload of general practitioners before and after the new contract.

D Hannay1, T Usherwood, M Platts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in general practitioners' workload associated with the new contract introduced in April 1990.
DESIGN: Weekly workload diary completed during four weeks in February-March 1990 and during the same period in 1991.
SETTING: Sheffield, United Kingdom.
SUBJECTS: All 300 general practitioners on Sheffield Family Health Services Authority list as principals in 1990 and 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean number of hours worked per week, number of patients seen each week, and mean time spent per patient.
RESULTS: 181 (60%) general practitioners responded in 1990 and 163 (54%) in 1991. Of these, 18 (10%) were not working in 1990 and 14 (7%) in 1991. General medical service work increased during a "normal working week" from a mean of 38.6 hours a week in 1990 to 40.6 hours in 1991, and non-general medical service work decreased from 5.4 hours a week to 4.5 hours. Hours spent on call were similar before and after the contract. For the 99 general practitioners who responded in both years, time spent on general medical service duties increased significantly (40.5 h in 1990 v 42.5 h [corrected] in 1991; p = 0.033), mainly due to more time being spent in clinics. Significantly more patients were being seen in clinics (9 v 14; p = 0.001); the average time spent per patient remained at about 8 1/2 minutes during surgeries and 16 minutes for a home visit, and rose from 13 to 14 minutes for patients seen in clinics. The time spent on practice administration fell but not significantly.
CONCLUSION: Since the new contract there has been a significant increase in general medical services work, mainly due to more patients being seen in clinics, with no reduction in the time spent per patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1559092      PMCID: PMC1881361          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  General practitioners' workload.

Authors:  L Ridsdale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-08

Review 2.  Estimates of general practitioner workload: a review.

Authors:  K Thomas; S Birch; P Milner; J Nicholl; L Westlake; B Williams
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-12
  2 in total
  22 in total

1.  Relationship between new and return consultations and workload in general practice.

Authors:  J Bain
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Stress and morale in general practice: a comparison of two health care systems.

Authors:  A E Gilliland; H Sinclair; M E Cupples; M McSweeney; D Mac Auley; T C O'Dowd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  General practitioners' contract: the good, the bad, and the slippery slope.

Authors:  D R Hannay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  General practitioners' attitudes to child injury prevention in the UK: a national postal questionnaire.

Authors:  Y H Carter; P S Morgan; R J Lancashire
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Workload in general practice under the new contract.

Authors:  S Myerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-25

6.  Practice organization before and after the new contract: a survey of general practices in Sheffield.

Authors:  D R Hannay; T P Usherwood; M Platts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; E F Kaner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

8.  Changes in general practice organization: survey of general practitioners' views on the 1990 contract and fundholding.

Authors:  B Leese; N Bosanquet
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Will the future GP remain a personal doctor?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners.

Authors:  N Mathers; N Jones; D Hannay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.