Literature DB >> 9101120

Sequelae of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris. Reliability and safety profile of long-term clinical application.

G A Jessurun1, I A Ten Vaarwerk, M J DeJongste, R A Tio, M J Staal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in the treatment of severe coronary artery disease (CAD) unresponsive to anti-anginal medication or revascularization procedures. However, there is still concern about its safety.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability, morbidity, and mortality aspects of SCS in patients with refractory angina pectoris by studying the predictors of outcome, defined by efficacy, adverse events and mortality, in patients with CAD and SCS.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (18 women) treated with SCS, aged 59.8 +/- 7.6 years (mean +/- SD) were studied retrospectively. They had suffered from manifest CAD for 9.4 +/- 4.9 years; 46 of them had experienced a myocardial infarction prior to the implantation; 28 had had a previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; and 52 had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 51.8 +/- 13.8%. All of the patients were being treated with two or three anti-anginal drugs.
RESULTS: During 2042 patient-months follow-up, nine of the 57 patients died (annual mortality rate 6.5%). The percentage of adverse events requiring reprogramming or surgical reintervention was reduced from 83% for 18 patients with the Medtronic ITREL lead to 33% for 39 patients with the ITREL II system. The clinical outcome was correlated positively with a left ventricular ejection fraction > 40% (P = 0.0005), and negatively with a high cholesterol level (P = 0.0042), more prior revascularizations (P = 0.028), and a higher New York Heart Association classification (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of the SCS system reduced the equipment-related complication rate. The predictors of outcome are related to the traditional risk factors for CAD. The mortality rate of patients with refractory angina treated with SCS is similar to that of patients with CAD and stable angina pectoris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9101120     DOI: 10.1097/00019501-199701000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Coron Artery Dis        ISSN: 0954-6928            Impact factor:   1.439


  6 in total

Review 1.  Stimulation methods for neuropathic pain control.

Authors:  M P Stojanovic
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

2.  Clinical outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory angina pectoris. The Working Group on Neurocardiology.

Authors:  I A TenVaarwerk; G A Jessurun; M J DeJongste; C Andersen; C Mannheimer; T Eliasson; W Tadema; M J Staal
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study.

Authors:  Stephan Eddicks; Klaus Maier-Hauff; Michael Schenk; Andreas Müller; Gert Baumann; Heinz Theres
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of angina and peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-02

Review 5.  Current and future trends in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  T R Deer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-12

6.  Symptomatic relief precedes improvement of myocardial blood flow in patients under spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Holger Diedrichs; Carsten Zobel; Peter Theissen; Michael Weber; Athanassios Koulousakis; Harald Schicha; Robert H G Schwinger
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-05-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.