Literature DB >> 10377314

Clinical outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory angina pectoris. The Working Group on Neurocardiology.

I A TenVaarwerk1, G A Jessurun, M J DeJongste, C Andersen, C Mannheimer, T Eliasson, W Tadema, M J Staal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine morbidity and mortality characteristics in patients treated with electrical neuromodulation for refractory angina pectoris.
DESIGN: A retrospective multicentre study of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation between 1987 and 1997; 21 centres were contacted and 14 responded.
SETTING: Specialist centres worldwide. PATIENTS: Questionnaires were returned on 517 patients, of whom 71% were male. One was lost to follow up. Mean (SD) age was 63.9 (10.1) years. Duration of angina pectoris was 8.1 (6.3) years.
RESULTS: Before spinal cord stimulation, 66% of the patients had experienced myocardial infarction, 68% had three vessel disease, and in 24% the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was </= 40%. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery were performed in 17% and 58% of the subjects, respectively. During a median follow up of 23 months (range 0 to 128), 103 patients died (52 from a cardiac cause, 25 from a non-cardiac cause, and 26 from an unknown cause). Annual all cause mortality was 7-8%; annual cardiovascular fatality was 3.5-5%. Mortality was univariately related to sex, number of diseased vessels, number of revascularisation procedures, previous myocardial infarction, LVEF, insulin dependent diabetes, beta blocking agents, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Multiple variate analysis showed that LVEF, sex, beta blockers, and age >/= 71 years were independent predictors of mortality. During spinal cord stimulation, New York Heart Association functional class improved from 3.5 to 2.1 (p < 0.01); 25 of the deceased patients (24%) and 32 survivors (8%) experienced myocardial infarction; hospital admissions were significantly (p < 0.001) more common in the deceased group (66% v 37%).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome of patients with intractable angina is not adversely affected by the chronic use of neurostimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10377314      PMCID: PMC1729112          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.82.1.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  19 in total

1.  Effect of spinal cord stimulation on regional myocardial perfusion assessed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  C De Landsheere; C Mannheimer; A Habets; M Guillaume; I Bourgeois; L E Augustinsson; T Eliasson; D Lamotte; H Kulbertus; P Rigo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Guidelines and indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Risk factor profiles of patients with sudden cardiac death and death from other cardiac causes: a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).

Authors:  D R Holmes; K Davis; B J Gersh; M B Mock; M B Pettinger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  High cervical spinal cord stimulation for unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  J M González-Darder; P Canela; V González-Martinez
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study.

Authors:  C Mannheimer; T Eliasson; L E Augustinsson; C Blomstrand; H Emanuelsson; S Larsson; H Norrsell; A Hjalmarsson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina--long-term clinical outcome and safety.

Authors:  J E Sanderson; B Ibrahim; D Waterhouse; R B Palmer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischaemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study.

Authors:  M J de Jongste; J Haaksma; R W Hautvast; H L Hillege; P W Meyler; M J Staal; J E Sanderson; K I Lie
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-05

8.  Dorsal column stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectoris.

Authors:  D F Murphy; K E Giles
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Stimulation characteristics, complications, and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation systems in patients with refractory angina: a prospective feasibility study.

Authors:  M J de Jongste; D Nagelkerke; C M Hooyschuur; H L Journée; P W Meyler; M J Staal; P de Jonge; K I Lie
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris.

Authors:  C Mannheimer; L E Augustinsson; C A Carlsson; K Manhem; C Wilhelmsson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-01
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Chronic therapeutically refractory angina pectoris.

Authors:  Mike J L DeJongste; René A Tio; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Alternative treatments for angina.

Authors:  Gaetano A Lanza
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Treatment options for refractory angina in patients who are not candidates for revascularization.

Authors:  C Richard Conti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Kevin Cheng; Paul Sainsbury; Michael Fisher; Ranil de Silva
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

5.  Effective treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy by high-frequency external muscle stimulation.

Authors:  L Reichstein; S Labrenz; D Ziegler; S Martin
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  Contemporary management of chronic stable angina.

Authors:  A D Staniforth
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  A prospective study of patients with refractory angina: outcomes and the role of high-sensitivity troponin T.

Authors:  Nilson T Poppi; Luís H W Gowdak; Luciana O C Dourado; Eduardo L Adam; Thiago N P Leite; Bruno M Mioto; José E Krieger; Luiz A M César; Alexandre C Pereira
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 8.  Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of angina and peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-02

9.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Wilbert S. Aronow; William H. Frishman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-02

10.  Enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of refractory angina pectoris: two year outcome and baseline factors associated with treatment failure.

Authors:  André Erdling; Susanne Bondesson; Thomas Pettersson; Lars Edvinsson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.