Literature DB >> 9099189

Health status of individuals with mild stroke.

P W Duncan1, G P Samsa, M Weinberger, L B Goldstein, A Bonito, D M Witter, C Enarson, D Matchar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Diminished quality of life and limitations in higher levels of physical functioning are often underestimated in stroke and are not fully captured by measures such as the Barthel Index and the Rankin Outcome Scale. This study used additional measures to assess the health status of 304 persons with mild stroke and to compare these individuals with 184 persons with transient ischemic attack and 654 persons without history of stroke/transient ischemic attack but at elevated risk for stroke (asymptomatic group).
METHODS: Subjects were recruited from the Academic Medical Center Consortium (inpatients), the Cardiovascular Health Study (population-based sample of community-dwelling persons 65 years and older), and United HealthCare (inpatients and outpatients typically younger than 65 years). Subjects were interviewed by telephone or in person to assess activities of daily living (Barthel Index), depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), health status (MOS-36), and utility for current health state.
RESULTS: Most respondents were independent on all Barthel items. The stroke group was more impaired on the MOS-36 than the asymptomatic group but similar to the group with transient ischemic attack. Health-related quality of life was lowest for persons with stroke. While symptom status and Barthel Index score were the strongest predictors of health status, the Barthel Index showed a consistent ceiling effect when compared with the physical function subscale of the MOS-36.
CONCLUSIONS: The consequences of even mild stroke affect all dimensions of health except pain. Standardized assessment of persons with stroke must evaluate across the entire continuum of health-related functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9099189     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.28.4.740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  45 in total

1.  Social networks, stress and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  H Achat; I Kawachi; S Levine; C Berkey; E Coakley; G Colditz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift?

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo; Marc Corbiere; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; James Hanley; Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

4.  Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities.

Authors:  Ruth Barclay-Goddard; Joshua D Epstein; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Quality of life after lacunar stroke: the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study.

Authors:  Mandip S Dhamoon; Leslie A McClure; Carole L White; Helena Lau; Oscar Benavente; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Gabriele H Franke; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: the usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D.

Authors:  N J A van Exel; W J M Scholte op Reimer; M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Serum lipid changes following the onset of depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jane E Persons; Jennifer G Robinson; Martha E Payne; Jess G Fiedorowicz
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Study protocol of the YOU CALL--WE CALL TRIAL: impact of a multimodal support intervention after a "mild" stroke.

Authors:  Annie Rochette; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; Duane Bishop; Robert Teasell; Carole White; Gina Bravo; Robert Côté; Jean Lachaine; Teri Green; Louise-Hélène Lebrun; Sylvain Lanthier; Moira Kapral; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.