Literature DB >> 9093973

Reliability of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: surface inclinometers.

S P Chen1, D G Samo, E H Chen, A R Crampton, K M Conrad, L Egan, J Mitton.   

Abstract

Three surface methods for measuring lumbar sagittal motion (LSM) were tested for reliability. The three methods used were the Pleurimeter V double inclinometer, the carpenter double inclinometer, and the computerized single sensor inclinometer. In this study, 30 volunteers were examined independently by three occupational health professionals. Each volunteer rotated twice through three stations at which LSM was measured by each of the three methods. The intra- and interexaminer reliabilities in identifying the skin levels of T12 and S1 were acceptable, having intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) greater than or equal to 0.75. With a single exception, all ICC values for the intraexaminer reliability of LSM measurements fell below 0.90 (a clinically desirable level). The interexaminer reliability was poor, with all ICC values below 0.75. The largest source of measurement error was attributable to the examiner and its associated factors. We concluded that the intra- and interexaminer reliabilities varied greatly, limiting the clinical usefulness of the three surface methods.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9093973     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199703000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  6 in total

1.  Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing.

Authors:  Liba Sheeran; Valerie Sparkes; Monica Busse; Robert van Deursen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students.

Authors:  Pedro A López-Miñarro; Pilar Sáinz de Baranda Andújar; Pedro L Rodrñguez-Garcña
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Vanitha Arumugam; Joshua I Vincent; Kimberly L Payne; Aubrey K So
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability of joint range of motion tests using tape measure, digital inclinometer and inertial motion capturing.

Authors:  Laura Fraeulin; Fabian Holzgreve; Mark Brinkbäumer; Anna Dziuba; David Friebe; Stefanie Klemz; Marco Schmitt; Anna-Lena Theis A; Sarah Tenberg; Anke van Mark; Christian Maurer-Grubinger; Daniela Ohlendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Jayce Gilbert; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Classification System of the Sagittal Integral Morphotype in Children from the ISQUIOS Programme (Spain).

Authors:  Fernando Santonja-Medina; Mónica Collazo-Diéguez; María Teresa Martínez-Romero; Olga Rodríguez-Ferrán; Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento; Antonio Cejudo; Pilar Andújar; Pilar Sainz de Baranda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.