Literature DB >> 9085062

Management of the pelvic space with or without omentoplasty after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum: a prospective multicenter study. The French Association for Surgical Research.

J M Hay1, A Fingerhut, J C Paquet, Y Flamant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perineal healing with or without omentoplasty after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum.
DESIGN: Prospective multicentre study.
SETTING: 15 centres (three university, nine non-university teaching hospitals and three private clinics), France.
SUBJECTS: 186 consecutive patients (between January 1983 and August 1990): 21 were withdrawn because of protocol violation leaving 165 for analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the distal third of the rectum followed by omentoplasty (n = 64) to the pelvic space or not (n = 101). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of healed perineums at one month, and the time interval to complete healing.
RESULTS: 7 patients (4%) died, 4 of whom had had omentoplasty and 3 who had not (one perineal abscess). The number who developed immediate postoperative complications (11/64, 17% and 18/101, 18%) and median duration of hospital stay (21 days, range 8-191, and 22 days, range 8-132) were similar. The median time to complete healing (20 and 21 days), the rate of healed perineums at one month (42/62 and 67/99, both 68%) and the number of persisting sinuses at 12 months were also similar. The number of dehiscences of the perineum was significantly higher (p = 0.04) in the no omentoplasty group (16 compared with 3). There were 3 late deaths in the omentoplasty group and 7 in the no omentoplasty group, 1 and 5 with local recurrence, respectively. There were more recurrences in the no omentoplasty group but not significantly so.
CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was not randomised, the results suggest that omentoplasty to the pelvic space promotes perineal healing after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum by significantly reducing the need for secondary opening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9085062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  14 in total

Review 1.  The omentum: anatomical, metabolic, and surgical aspects.

Authors:  Danielle Collins; Aisling M Hogan; Donal O'Shea; Des C Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Wound dehiscence after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer is associated with decreased survival.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; David L Berger; Paul C Shellito; Patrica Sylla; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Extended pelvic resection for rectal and anal canal tumors is a significant risk factor for perineal wound infection: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ken Imaizumi; Yuji Nishizawa; Koji Ikeda; Yuichiro Tsukada; Takeshi Sasaki; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Pelvic reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: a pilot study using an absorbable synthetic prosthesis.

Authors:  C Moreno-Sanz; M Manzanera-Díaz; F J Cortina-Oliva; J de Pedro-Conal; M Clerveus; J Picazo-Yeste
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Risk factors for wound complications in patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal defect after total proctectomy.

Authors:  Marco Bertucci Zoccali; Alberto Biondi; Mukta Krane; Essie Kueberuwa; Gianluca Rizzo; Roberto Persiani; Claudio Coco; Roger D Hurst; Domenico D'Ugo; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wiatrek; J Scott Thomas; Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

7.  Management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Johannes H W de Wilt; Maarten Vermaas; Floris T J Ferenschild; Cornelis Verhoef
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

8.  Prognostic factors for postoperative morbidity and tumour response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annefleur E M Berkel; Dankert P Woutersen; Job van der Palen; Joost M Klaase
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Predictors of wound dehiscence and its impact on mortality after abdominoperineal resection: data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  A Rencuzogullari; E Gorgun; S Binboga; G Ozuner; H Kessler; M A Abbas
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Guideline proposal to reconstructive surgery for complex perineal sinus or rectal fistula.

Authors:  J W P M Oomen; P H M Spauwen; R P Bleichrodt; H van Goor
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.