Literature DB >> 27189443

Predictors of wound dehiscence and its impact on mortality after abdominoperineal resection: data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

A Rencuzogullari1, E Gorgun2, S Binboga1, G Ozuner1, H Kessler1, M A Abbas1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wound dehiscence is a known complication following abdominoperineal resection (APR) and can have a negative impact on recovery and outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of post-APR 30-day abdominal and/or perineal wound dehiscence, readmission, and reoperation, and to assess the impact of wound dehiscence on 30-day mortality.
METHODS: All patients undergoing APR between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
RESULTS: There were 5161 patients [male = 3076 (59.6 %)] with a mean age of 61.9 ± 14.3 years. Mean body mass index was 27.4 ± 6.6 kg/m(2). The most common indication for surgery was rectal cancer (79.1 %), followed by inflammatory bowel disease (8.2 %). The overall rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7 % (n = 141). Older age (p = 0.013), baseline dyspnea (p = 0.043), smoking history (p = 0.009), and muscle flap creation (p ≤ 0.001) were independently associated with the risk of dehiscence. No association was observed between omental flap creation and dehiscence risk (p = 0.47). The 30-day readmission rate (15.6 vs. 5.6 %, p ≤ 0.001) and need for reoperation (39 vs. 6.6 %, p ≤ 0.001) were significantly higher in patients who experienced dehiscence. Dehiscence was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality [OR = 2.69 (1.02-7.08), p = 0.045)].
CONCLUSIONS: Older age, baseline dyspnea, smoking, and the use of muscle flap were associated with higher risk of wound dehiscence following APR. Patients with wound dehiscence had a higher rate of readmission and need for reoperation, and an increased risk of 30-day mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS-NSQIP; Abdominoperineal resection; Mortality; Wound dehiscence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27189443     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1486-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  21 in total

Review 1.  Is 30-day mortality an appropriate measure of risk in elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal resection?

Authors:  R Mamidanna; A M Almoudaris; O Faiz
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure.

Authors:  Kelli M Bullard; Judith L Trudel; Nancy N Baxter; David A Rothenberger
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk Study.

Authors:  J Daley; M G Forbes; G J Young; M P Charns; J O Gibbs; K Hur; W Henderson; S F Khuri
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Abdominoperineal excision: evolution of a centenary operation.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos; Angelita Habr-Gama; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Rodrigo Oliva Perez
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Comparison of 30-day, 90-day and in-hospital postoperative mortality for eight different cancer types.

Authors:  R A M Damhuis; B P L Wijnhoven; P W Plaisier; W J Kirkels; R Kranse; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Mary R Kwaan; Rebecca A Betensky; Elizabeth M Breen; Michael J Zinner; Ronald Bleday
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects.

Authors:  Charles E Butler; A Ozlem Gündeslioglu; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM).

Authors:  Ahmed Touny; Haitham Othman; Sherif Maamoon; Samy Ramzy; Hamdy Elmarakby
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  V-Y Bilateral gluteus maximus myocutaneous advancement flap in the reconstruction of large perineal defects after resection of pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  D Di Mauro; A D'Hoore; F Penninckx; I De Wever; I Vergote; R Hierner
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Leigh Neumayer; Karl Hammermeister; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy Healey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comment on: Predictors of wound dehiscence and its impact on mortality after abdominoperineal resection: data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Rencuzogullari A, Gorgun E, Binboga S, Ozuner G, Kessler H, Abbas MA.

Authors:  R D Blok; G D Musters; P J Tanis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.781

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.