Literature DB >> 9081391

Measurement of plasma 5-fluorouracil by high-performance liquid chromatography with comparison of results to tissue drug levels observed using in vivo 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients on a protracted venous infusion with or without interferon-alpha.

M P Findlay1, F Raynaud, D Cunningham, A Iveson, D J Collins, M O Leach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure plasma 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) levels using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and compare the findings to the tissue metabolism of 5-FU evaluated using 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), during a protracted venous infusion (PVI) with or without interferon-alpha.
METHODS: Patients receiving PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) with or without interferon-alpha (5 x 10(6) units 3 times per week), had 2 weekly plasma 5-FU levels evaluated using reverse-phase ion-pairing HPLC. These samples were drawn just prior to the patient undergoing MRS using a 1.5T Siemens Magnetom whole body magnetic resonance system with a 16 cm surface coil placed over normal liver or metastatic tumour. Semi-quantitated MRS values were compared with the plasma 5-FU levels using linear regression analysis. Data were available from patients given interferon-alpha with PVI 5-FU from day 1 or at the point of 5-FU refractory disease.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were studied. Plasma 5-FU concentrations while on a protracted venous infusion varied from <25 ng/ml (0.192 mu M) to 25,000 ng/ml (192 mu M). A high plasma 5-FU concentration was associated with an increase in patient toxicity. Patients given interferon-alpha with 5-FU had higher median plasma 5-FU levels higher than patients on 5-FU alone (6138 vs. 218 ng/ml; p = 0.03). There was no correlation between the plasma 5-FU concentration and tumour response. A comparison of the plasma 5-FU data to the MRS studies in normal liver revealed a positive correlation between plasma 5-FU and liver catabolite signal (r = 0.68; p = 0.016) but a negative correlation with the log plasma 5-FU concentration and 5-FU liver signal (r = -0.63; p = 0.022). The patients experiencing toxicity, in addition to having a higher plasma 5-FU concentration did not exhibit a liver 5-FU signal, while the reverse was true for those having no toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Plasma 5-FU levels may show greater interpatient variation when given as a protracted venous infusion. Levels of 5-FU correlated with treatment toxicity but not with anti-tumour activity. The addition of interferon-alpha to 5-FU increases plasma 5-FU levels. MRS findings suggest patients with low plasma 5-FU levels have higher 5-FU levels in normal liver tissue than in those with higher plasma levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9081391     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  12 in total

1.  Usefulness of a pharmacist outpatient service for S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michio Kimura; Makiko Go; Mina Iwai; Eiseki Usami; Hitomi Teramachi; Tomoaki Yoshimura
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-21

2.  Noninvasive quantitation of cytosine deaminase transgene expression in human tumor xenografts with in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  L D Stegman; A Rehemtulla; B Beattie; E Kievit; T S Lawrence; R G Blasberg; J G Tjuvajev; B D Ross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  How may anticancer chemotherapy with fluorouracil be individualised?

Authors:  Su-arpa Ploylearmsaeng; Uwe Fuhr; Alexander Jetter
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Early tumor drug pharmacokinetics is influenced by tumor perfusion but not plasma drug exposure.

Authors:  Azeem Saleem; Pat M Price
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Does leucovorin alter the intratumoral pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)? A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Cary A Presant; Joth Jacobson; Walter Wolf; Victor Waluch; Ilene C Weitz; John S Macdonald
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Can localised (19)F magnetic resonance spectroscopy pharmacokinetics of 5FU in colorectal metastases predict clinical response?

Authors:  Dominick J O McIntyre; Franklyn A Howe; Christophe Ladroue; Fiona Lofts; Marion Stubbs; John R Griffiths
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Influence of pH on the uptake of 5-fluorouracil into isolated tumour cells.

Authors:  A S Ojugo; P M McSheehy; M Stubbs; G Alder; C L Bashford; R J Maxwell; M O Leach; I R Judson; J R Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  5-fluorouracil steady state pharmacokinetics and outcome in patients receiving protracted venous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D I Jodrell; M Stewart; R Aird; G Knowles; A Bowman; L Wall; C McLean
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Non-invasive 19F MR spectroscopy of 5-fluorocytosine to 5-fluorouracil conversion by recombinant Salmonella in tumours.

Authors:  T Dresselaers; J Theys; S Nuyts; B Wouters; E de Bruijn; J Anné; P Lambin; P Van Hecke; W Landuyt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Analysis of the time course and prognostic factors determining toxicity due to infused fluorouracil.

Authors:  N C Tebbutt; A R Norman; D Cunningham; M Allen; I Chau; J Oates; M Hill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.