PURPOSE AND DESIGN: We previously documented that there was an association between the intra-tumoral pharmacokinetics (TPK) of 5-FU and response to therapy with 5-FU and leucovorin (p < .0001). Since we have shown that other modulators of 5-FU, such as methotrexate, interferon and neutrexin alter its TPK, it was of interest to determine if the modulating effect of leucovorin would also alter the tumoral PK of 5-FU. In order to determine the effect of leucovorin on intratumoral 5-FU pharmacokinetics, 23 patients (21 evaluable) underwent 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy (19F-MRS) twice. The first 19F-MRS was following 5-FU 600 mg/m2 alone, and the second 19F-MRS was following by leucovorin 500 mg/m2 and then 5-FU 600 mg/m2. RESULTS: A comparison of the intratumoral 5-FU pharmacokinetics indicated that there was no general effect of leucovorin on the intratumoral half-life of 5-FU. In only two of these 21 patients was the half-life of 5-FU altered, and in both cases it was decreased by more than 20%. Partial responses to 5-FU plus leucovorin therapy were seen only in patients with a long intratumoral half-life (trapping) of 5-FU (3 PR in 11 patients with T1/2 > or = 20 minutes, compared to 0 PR in 11 patients with T1/2 < 20 minutes). There was a statistically significant correlation between tumor response and the intratumoral T1/2 of 5-FU, consistent with our prior results in a larger number of patients. However, there was no statistically significant correlation of time-to-progression or survival with classification of the patients into trappers or non-trappers, probably due to the small sample size in this current study. CONCLUSION: The data reported here are compatible with the hypothesis that leucovorin enhancement of 5-fluorouracil antitumor responses is not mediated by the levels of 5-FU in tumors, but rather, is due to the modulation by leucovorin of cellular metabolic processes that follow the uptake of free 5-FU into the tumor cell. The MRS technique may be useful in selected instances for elucidating the possible metabolic interactions of drugs in vivo.
PURPOSE AND DESIGN: We previously documented that there was an association between the intra-tumoral pharmacokinetics (TPK) of 5-FU and response to therapy with 5-FU and leucovorin (p < .0001). Since we have shown that other modulators of 5-FU, such as methotrexate, interferon and neutrexin alter its TPK, it was of interest to determine if the modulating effect of leucovorin would also alter the tumoral PK of 5-FU. In order to determine the effect of leucovorin on intratumoral 5-FU pharmacokinetics, 23 patients (21 evaluable) underwent 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy (19F-MRS) twice. The first 19F-MRS was following 5-FU 600 mg/m2 alone, and the second 19F-MRS was following by leucovorin 500 mg/m2 and then 5-FU 600 mg/m2. RESULTS: A comparison of the intratumoral 5-FU pharmacokinetics indicated that there was no general effect of leucovorin on the intratumoral half-life of 5-FU. In only two of these 21 patients was the half-life of 5-FU altered, and in both cases it was decreased by more than 20%. Partial responses to 5-FU plus leucovorin therapy were seen only in patients with a long intratumoral half-life (trapping) of 5-FU (3 PR in 11 patients with T1/2 > or = 20 minutes, compared to 0 PR in 11 patients with T1/2 < 20 minutes). There was a statistically significant correlation between tumor response and the intratumoral T1/2 of 5-FU, consistent with our prior results in a larger number of patients. However, there was no statistically significant correlation of time-to-progression or survival with classification of the patients into trappers or non-trappers, probably due to the small sample size in this current study. CONCLUSION: The data reported here are compatible with the hypothesis that leucovorin enhancement of 5-fluorouracil antitumor responses is not mediated by the levels of 5-FU in tumors, but rather, is due to the modulation by leucovorin of cellular metabolic processes that follow the uptake of free 5-FU into the tumor cell. The MRS technique may be useful in selected instances for elucidating the possible metabolic interactions of drugs in vivo.
Authors: C A Presant; W Wolf; M J Albright; K L Servis; R Ring; D Atkinson; R L Ong; C Wiseman; M King; D Blayney Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M P Findlay; M O Leach; D Cunningham; D J Collins; G S Payne; J Glaholm; J L Mansi; V R McCready Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A S Ojugo; P M McSheehy; M Stubbs; G Alder; C L Bashford; R J Maxwell; M O Leach; I R Judson; J R Griffiths Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Niyaz Ahmad; Ahmed A Albassam; Mohd Faiyaz Khan; Zabih Ullah; Taysser Mohammed Buheazah; Hussain Salman AlHomoud; Hassan Ali Al-Nasif Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 4.052