Literature DB >> 9069140

Postoperative complications of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy.

A M Lacy1, J C García-Valdecasas, S Delgado, L Grande, J Fuster, J Tabet, C Ramos, J M Piqué, A Cifuentes, J Visa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to prospectively assess the complications of 118 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted colorectal resections.
METHODS: The variables included were: indication for surgery, type of resection, duration of operation, duration of postoperative ileus, length of hospital stay, port-site recurrence, and complications in relation to the laparoscopic technique.
RESULTS: 118 Laparoscopic-assisted procedures were performed between July 1992 and October 1995. Surgical indications were: 106 patients for colonic malignancy, six for diverticulitis, two for Crohn's disease, two for benign polyps, one for endometriosis, and one for ischemic colitis. Fifteen patients required conversion to open techniques for completion of the operations (12.7%). The mean operating time was 168.8 min. The amount of operative blood loss was 98 ml. The mean time for passing flatus was 36 +/- 16 h. Mean postoperative stay was 5.4 (range 3-13) days. Eight patients (6.8%) sustained complications: four unrelated to laparoscopy (three wound infection, one anastomotic leak); and four complications related to the laparoscopic approach: one small-bowel obstruction, one trocar injury, one rotation of the anastomosis, and one misdiagnosed synchronous adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that with the development of improved technical devices and more experience, the indications for laparoscopic colectomy should continue to expand. The low incidence of infectious complications suggests an important role for the laparoscopic approach to colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9069140     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  S Delgado; A M Lacy; J C García Valdecasas; C Balagué; M Pera; L Salvador; D Momblan; J Visa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Subcutaneous metastasis at a surgical drain site after the resection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; Cuong C Nguyen; David C Mulligan; Adyr A Moss
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

4.  Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?

Authors:  P A Seshadri; E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Lena Hauenschild; Franz Georg Bader; Tilman Laubert; Ralf Czymek; Philipp Hildebrand; Uwe Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Lutz Mirow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome?

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Steven Mills; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for bleeding varices or severe hypersplenism: a comparative study.

Authors:  Cheng Zhe; Li Jian-wei; Chen Jian; Fan Yu-dong; Bie Ping; Wang Shu-guang; Zheng Shu-guo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  O Zmora; P Gervaz; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?

Authors:  Ricardo M Bonnor; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

10.  Superficial Surgical Site Infection in Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery: Subcuticular Suture Versus Skin Staples.

Authors:  Koichi Tomita; Naokazu Chiba; Shigeto Ochiai; Kei Yokozuka; Takahiro Gunji; Kosuke Hikita; Yosuke Ozawa; Masaaki Okihara; Toru Sano; Rina Tsutsui; Motohide Shimazu; Shigeyuki Kawachi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.