OBJECTIVES: This study assessed prospectively the correlation between the conal branch of the right coronary artery and the pattern of ST segment elevation in leads V1 and V3R during anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: The traditional electrocardiographic (ECG) definition of anteroseptal AMI-ST segment elevation in leads V1 to V3-has recently been challenged. The significance of ST segment elevation in lead V1 during anterior wall AMI is unclear. METHODS: The admission 12-lead ECG with additional lead V3R and the coronary angiograms performed within 10 days of hospital admission were evaluated in 28 consecutive patients (mean age +/- SD 62 +/- 9 years) admitted to the coronary care unit with anterior wall AMI. Patients were classified into two groups according to the magnitude of ST segment elevation in lead V1: group A (elevation > or = 1.5 mm, n = 12) and group B (elevation < 1.5 mm, n = 16). Two types of conal branch were identified: small (not reaching the interventricular septum [IVS]) and large (reaching the IVS). RESULTS: ST segment elevation in lead V3R was found in 11 (92%) and 6 (37%) patients from group A and group B, respectively (p < 0.001); a small conal branch was seen in 10 (83%) and 3 (19%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Ten patients (all from group B) had a large conal branch. CONCLUSIONS: ST segment elevation in lead V1 in the admission ECG of patients with anterior wall AMI is strongly related to ST segment elevation in lead V3R and is associated with a small conal branch. Our findings suggest that lead V1 reflects the right paraseptal area supplied by the septal branches of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), alone or together with the conal branch. The absence of ST segment elevation in lead V1 during anterior AMI suggests that the IVS is protected by a large conal branch in addition to the septal branches of the LAD (double circulation).
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed prospectively the correlation between the conal branch of the right coronary artery and the pattern of ST segment elevation in leads V1 and V3R during anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: The traditional electrocardiographic (ECG) definition of anteroseptal AMI-ST segment elevation in leads V1 to V3-has recently been challenged. The significance of ST segment elevation in lead V1 during anterior wall AMI is unclear. METHODS: The admission 12-lead ECG with additional lead V3R and the coronary angiograms performed within 10 days of hospital admission were evaluated in 28 consecutive patients (mean age +/- SD 62 +/- 9 years) admitted to the coronary care unit with anterior wall AMI. Patients were classified into two groups according to the magnitude of ST segment elevation in lead V1: group A (elevation > or = 1.5 mm, n = 12) and group B (elevation < 1.5 mm, n = 16). Two types of conal branch were identified: small (not reaching the interventricular septum [IVS]) and large (reaching the IVS). RESULTS: ST segment elevation in lead V3R was found in 11 (92%) and 6 (37%) patients from group A and group B, respectively (p < 0.001); a small conal branch was seen in 10 (83%) and 3 (19%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Ten patients (all from group B) had a large conal branch. CONCLUSIONS: ST segment elevation in lead V1 in the admission ECG of patients with anterior wall AMI is strongly related to ST segment elevation in lead V3R and is associated with a small conal branch. Our findings suggest that lead V1 reflects the right paraseptal area supplied by the septal branches of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), alone or together with the conal branch. The absence of ST segment elevation in lead V1 during anterior AMI suggests that the IVS is protected by a large conal branch in addition to the septal branches of the LAD (double circulation).
Authors: Ian J Neeland; Melanie S Sulistio; Douglas A Stoller; James A de Lemos; James M Atkins; Darren K McGuire Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Muhammed Keskin; Ahmet Okan Uzun; Edibe Betül Börklü; Mert İlker Hayıroğlu; Ceyhan Türkkan; Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin; Ömer Kozan Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Eyyup Tusun; Mahmut Uluganyan; Murat Ugur; Gurkan Karaca; Faizel Osman; Bayram Koroglu; Ahmet Murat; Ahmet Ekmekci; Hüseyin Uyarel; Osman Sahin; Mehmet Eren; Osman Bolca Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Antonio H Frangieh; Slayman Obeid; Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Yoichi Imori; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Marc Kovac; Frank Ruschitzka; Thomas F Lüscher; Firat Duru; Christian Templin Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 5.501