Literature DB >> 9055292

Heads-up intraoperative endoscopic imaging: a prospective evaluation of techniques and limitations.

M L Levy1, J D Day, F Albuquerque, G Schumaker, S L Giannotta, J G McComb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopes have been used adjunctively for spinal and cranial microsurgical procedures and directly for ventricular exploration, fenestration, and catheterization. Technological advances now allow for multi-imaging technologies, including a so-called "heads-up display," allowing the surgeon to view the operative field and the endoscopic image simultaneously. INSTRUMENTATION: A high-resolution, active matrix liquid crystal display is built into the frame of the eyewear, with a display density of 182,000 pixels (280 x 650 pixels) and a resolution of 200 lines. The display occupies approximately 20% of the visual field. The headgear weighs 4 oz, with dimensions of 9 x 18 x 17 cm. The modular interface weighs 7 oz. Two different visualization systems can be used. The first uses a single integrated interface (IM 300), whereas the second (remote 900) is a 900-MHz frequency modulation wireless system that provides for a line-of-sight link between the NTSC source and the modular interface (range = 100 ft).
RESULTS: Heads-up adjunctive endoscopy was used in 60 patients during 18 months. The procedures included 16 craniotomies, 1 intradural lumbar biopsy, and 42 ventriculoperitoneal shunt placements. Follow-up was obtained at a minimum of 1 year. Patient age ranged from 1 month to 58 years. The only complication was a transient loss of auditory evoked potentials after contact of the eighth nerve by the endoscope.
CONCLUSION: We describe a portable, light-weight heads-up display imaging system, which we have used in 60 operative procedures. Benefits of the heads-up system include portability and a high-resolution digital monocular image, which reduces eye strain and vertigo. The ideal headgear will likely be an extremely high-resolution liquid crystal display-based or cathode ray tube-based semi-immersive system, with all of the benefits currently described for two-dimensional heads-up systems (i.e., light weight, portability, image quality, and the avoidance of complications associated with immersive systems).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9055292     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199703000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.

Authors:  Noemi Bitterman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A comparison of using digitally assisted vitreoretinal surgery during repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments to the conventional analog microscope: A prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Naresh Babu Kannan; Soumya Jena; Sagnik Sen; Piyush Kohli; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Intra-operative wearable visualization in spine surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Hasan S Ahmad; Jang W Yoon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

4.  Perk Station--Percutaneous surgery training and performance measurement platform.

Authors:  Siddharth Vikal; Paweena U-Thainual; John A Carrino; Iulian Iordachita; Gregory S Fischer; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area.

Authors:  G Widmann
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01

6.  Hybrid wide-angle viewing-endoscopic vitrectomy using a 3D visualization system.

Authors:  Mihori Kita; Yuki Mori; Sachiyo Hama
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.