Literature DB >> 35441103

Intra-operative wearable visualization in spine surgery: past, present, and future.

Hasan S Ahmad1, Jang W Yoon1.   

Abstract

The history of modern surgery has run parallel to the invention and development of intra-operative visualization techniques. The first operating room, built in 1804 at Pennsylvania Hospital, demonstrates this principle: illumination of the surgical field by the Sun through an overhead skylight allowed surgeries to proceed even prior to the invention of anesthesia or sterile technique. Surgeries were restricted to begin around when the Sun was at its zenith; without adequate light from the Sun and skylight, surgeons were unable to achieve adequate visualization. In the years since, new visualization instruments have expanded the scope and success of surgical intervention. Spine surgery in particular has benefited greatly from improved visualization technologies, due to the complex and intricate nervous, vascular and musculoskeletal structures that are closely intertwined which surgeons must manipulate. Over time, new technologies have also advanced to take up smaller footprints, leading to the rise of wearable tools that surgeons don intra-operatively to better visualize the surgical field. As surgical techniques shift to more minimally invasive methods, reliable, fidelitous, and ergonomic wearables are of growing importance. Here, we discuss the past and present of wearable visualization tools, from the first surgical loupes to cutting-edge augmented reality (AR) goggles, and comment on how emerging innovations will continue to revolutionize spine surgery. 2022 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spine surgery; augmented reality (AR); virtual reality; visualization; wearables

Year:  2022        PMID: 35441103      PMCID: PMC8990397          DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  31 in total

1.  Projector-based surgeon-computer interaction on deformable surfaces.

Authors:  Bojan Kocev; Felix Ritter; Lars Linsen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The effect of divided attention on novices and experts in laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  Mudassar Ali Ghazanfar; Malcolm Cook; Benjie Tang; Iain Tait; Afshin Alijani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Advances in Intraoperative Optics: A Brief Review of Current Exoscope Platforms.

Authors:  David J Langer; Timothy G White; Michael Schulder; John A Boockvar; Mohamed Labib; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.703

4.  Free-tissue transfer with the aid of loupe magnification: experience with 251 procedures.

Authors:  S M Shenaq; M J Klebuc; D Vargo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Yao-Sen Wu; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi; Fang-Min Mao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy/Discectomy, Transforaminal Lumbar, and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allicia O Imada; Tridu R Huynh; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Spine Surgery Supported by Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Barbara Carl; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Mirza Pojskic; Benjamin Voellger; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

8.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging: A First In-Human Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gustav Burström; Rami Nachabe; Halldor Skulason; Kyrre Pedersen; Michael Fagerlund; Fredrik Ståhl; Anastasios Charalampidis; Michael Söderman; Staffan Holmin; Drazenko Babic; Inge Jenniskens; Erik Edström; Paul Gerdhem
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 9.  Augmented reality navigation in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gustav Burström; Oscar Persson; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 10.  The emerging clinical role of wearables: factors for successful implementation in healthcare.

Authors:  Matthew Smuck; Charles A Odonkor; Jonathan K Wilt; Nicolas Schmidt; Michael A Swiernik
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-03-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Industry 5.0 technology capabilities in Trauma and Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthikeyan P Iyengar; Eindere Zaw Pe; Janaranjan Jalli; Madapura K Shashidhara; Vijay K Jain; Abhishek Vaish; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.