Literature DB >> 9052780

Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation.

R Nijhawan1.   

Abstract

The perception of yellow has played a central role in distinguishing two main theories of colour vision. Hering proposed that yellow results from the activation of a distinct retinal-neural mechanism, whereas according to the Young-Helmholtz-Maxwell view, yellow results from the combined activation of red and green cone mechanisms. When red and green images are presented separately to corresponding retinal locations in the two eyes, the resulting sensation is yellow. As the pathways from the two eyes do not converge until the cortex, this suggests that yellow can indeed arise from the central combining of separate red and green channels. I now show that the reverse process can also occur; the visual system can decompose a 'yellow' stimulus into its constituent red and green components. A 'yellow' stimulus was created by optically superimposing a flashed red line onto a moving green bar. If the bar is visible only briefly, the flashed line appears yellow. If the trajectory of the green bar is exposed for sufficient time, however, the line is incorrectly perceived to trail the bar, and appears red. Motion processing occurs in the cortex rather than the retina in primates, and so the ability of motion cues to affect the perception of colour is consistent with the Young-Helmholtz-Maxwell notion of a 'central synthesis' of yellow.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9052780     DOI: 10.1038/386066a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Motion misperception caused by feedback connections: a neural model simulating the Fröhlich effect.

Authors:  Elena Carbone; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-28

3.  An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  William T Wojtach; Kyongje Sung; Sandra Truong; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Flash-lag effect: complicating motion extrapolation of the moving reference-stimulus paradoxically augments the effect.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Carolina Murd; Endel Põder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-05

Review 5.  Knowledge in perception and illusion.

Authors:  R L Gregory
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The buzz-lag effect.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lisa Scocchia; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The science behind the quest to determine the age of bruises-a review of the English language literature.

Authors:  N E I Langlois
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.007

8.  Prediction, cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Andreja Bubic; D Yves von Cramon; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The flash grab effect.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Neuroscience: toward unbinding the binding problem.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.