Literature DB >> 9048861

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Development, instrumentation, and current status.

J E Lingeman1.   

Abstract

In this article, the author briefly reviews the early development of the lithotriptor, provides a detailed review of lithotriptors that are currently available, and gives an overview of the present extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy indications and techniques. The author also presents a brief overview of the results that are produced by various lithotriptors.

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9048861     DOI： 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70363-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  12 in total

1.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.

Authors:  Yifei Xing; Tony T Chen; Walter N Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Franklin H Cocks; Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  The effects of heat and mass diffusion on freely oscillating bubbles in a viscoelastic, tissue-like medium.

Authors:  Carlos Barajas; Eric Johnsen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stone comminution correlates with the average peak pressure incident on a stone during shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  N Smith; P Zhong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Neophytos Petrides; Safiyah Ismail; Faqar Anjum; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

10.  Effects of Stone Size on the Comminution Process and Efficiency in Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Isaac Nault; Sorin Mitran; Edwin S Iversen; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.