Literature DB >> 9043544

Statistical methodology: II. Reliability and validity assessment in study design, Part B.

D J Karras1.   

Abstract

Validity measures the correspondence between a test and other purported measures of the same or similar qualities. When a reference standard exists, a criterion-based validity coefficient can be calculated. If no such standard is available, the concepts of content and construct validity may be used, but quantitative analysis may not be possible. The Pearson and Spearman tests of correlation are often used to assess the correspondence between tests, but do not account for measurement biases and may yield misleading results. Techniques that measure interest differences may be more meaningful in validity assessment, and the kappa statistic is useful for analyzing categorical variables. Questionnaires often can be designed to allow quantitative assessment of reliability and validity, although this may be difficult. Inclusion of homogeneous questions is necessary to assess reliability. Analysis is enhanced by using Likert scales or similar techniques that yield ordinal data. Validity assessment of questionnaires requires careful definition of the scope of the test and comparison with previously validated tools.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043544     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03723.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  20 in total

1.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Educational and training aspects of new surgical techniques: experience with the endoscopic–laparoscopic interdisciplinary training entity (ELITE) model in training for a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to appendectomy.

Authors:  Sonja Gillen; Jörn Gröne; Fritz Knödgen; Petra Wolf; Michael Meyer; Helmut Friess; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Hubertus Feussner; Kai S Lehmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score.

Authors:  Patrick G Robinson; Conor S Rankin; Jonathan Lavery; Iain Anthony; Mark Blyth; Bryn Jones
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

Review 4.  A review of the role of simulation in developing and assessing orthopaedic surgical skills.

Authors:  Geb W Thomas; Brian D Johns; J Lawrence Marsh; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

5.  Inter- and intra-observer agreement on Miller's classification of gingival tissue recessions.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Dorothea Ruckenbauer; Michael Müller-Kern; Gerlinde Durstberger; Stefan Lettner; Corinna Bruckmann; Christian Ulm
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Can Dynamic Ultrasonography of the Hip Reliably Assess Anterior Femoral Head Translation?

Authors:  Pierre A d'Hemecourt; Dai Sugimoto; Maxwell McKee-Proctor; Rebecca L Zwicker; Sarah S Jackson; Eduardo N Novais; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Andrea Stracciolini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Face, content and construct validity of a new realistic trainer for conventional techniques in digestive surgery.

Authors:  Jörn Gröne; Johannes C Lauscher; Heinz J Buhr; Joerg-Peter Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Physical activity and healthy eating environmental audit tools in youth care settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rahma Ajja; Michael W Beets; Jessica Chandler; Andrew T Kaczynski; Dianne S Ward
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data.

Authors:  Ava L Liberman; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Computerized general practice based networks yield comparable performance with sentinel data in monitoring epidemiological time-course of influenza-like illness and acute respiratory illness.

Authors:  Carla Truyers; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Stefaan Bartholomeeusen; Bert Aertgeerts; René Snacken; Bernard Brochier; Fernande Yane; Frank Buntinx
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.