Literature DB >> 25351990

Inter- and intra-observer agreement on Miller's classification of gingival tissue recessions.

Kristina Bertl1,2, Dorothea Ruckenbauer3, Michael Müller-Kern4, Gerlinde Durstberger5, Stefan Lettner6,7, Corinna Bruckmann5, Christian Ulm3.   

Abstract

Miller's is the most commonly used classification of gingival tissue recessions, defined as the displacement of the soft tissue margin apical to the cemento-enamel junction. However, data on the reliability of this classification are missing so far, although reliability, which reflects the consistency of repeated measurements, is regarded as a prerequisite for judging the utility of a classification. The aim of the present study was to evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement on Miller's classification of gingival tissue recessions. Two hundred photographs (50 of each region: maxillary/mandibular anterior/posterior teeth) of gingival tissue recessions were evaluated twice by four observers with different degrees of experience in Miller's classification, gingival phenotype, tooth shape, and identifiability of the cemento-enamel junction. The following inter- and intra-observer agreements were found: Miller's classification, 0.72 and 0.73-0.95; gingival phenotype, 0.29 and 0.45-0.58; tooth shape, 0.39 and 0.44-0.59; and identifiability of the cemento-enamel junction, 0.21 and 0.30-0.59. A higher agreement was detected for anterior teeth. Further, gingival phenotype (thin-high scalloping) significantly correlated with tooth shape (long-narrow) (ρ = 0.662, p < 0.001). Miller's classification of gingival tissue recessions was evaluated by four examiners using 200 clinical photographs and yielded substantial to almost perfect agreement, with higher agreement for anterior teeth. Although limited to photographic assessment, the present study offers the so far missing proof on the sufficient inter- and intra-observer agreement of this classification.

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Gingival thickness; Gingival tissue recession; Plastic periodontal surgery; Treatment planning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25351990     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-014-0179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  23 in total

1.  Classification of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession.

Authors:  Giovanpaolo Pini-Prato; Debora Franceschi; Francesco Cairo; Michele Nieri; Roberto Rotundo
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision.

Authors:  Douglas G Bonett
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The use of free gingival grafts for the coverage of denuded roots.

Authors:  A Mlinek; H Smukler; A Buchner
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3. Utilization of grafts in the treatment of gingival recession.

Authors:  H C Sullivan; J H Atkins
Journal:  Periodontics       Date:  1968-08

5.  The influence of local anatomy on the outcome of treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Mauro Pedrine Santamaria; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Marcio Zaffalon Casati; Francisco Humberto Nociti; Antônio Wilson Sallum; Enilson Antônio Sallum
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  A surgical procedure for the treatment of localized gingival recession in conjunction with root surface citric acid conditioning.

Authors:  W J Liu; C W Solt
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994.

Authors:  J M Albandar; A Kingman
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Connective tissue graft plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mauro Pedrine Santamaria; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Marcio Zaffalon Casati; Francisco Humberto Nociti Júnior; Antônio Wilson Sallum; Enilson Antônio Sallum
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage.

Authors:  G Zucchelli; T Testori; M De Sanctis
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 10.  The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession.

Authors:  Moawia M Kassab; Robert E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inter- and intra-examiner agreement of three classification systems of gingival recession.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sarlati; Omid Moghaddas; Reza Shabahangfar; Sara Safari; Naser Valaei
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2019-08-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.