Literature DB >> 12061953

Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition.

Mark W Blows1.   

Abstract

The interaction between natural and sexual selection is central to many theories of how mate choice and reproductive isolation evolve, but their joint effect on the evolution of mate recognition has not, to my knowledge, been investigated in an evolutionary experiment. Natural and sexual selection were manipulated in interspecific hybrid populations of Drosophila to determine their effects on the evolution of a mate recognition system comprised of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). The effect of natural selection in isolation indicated that CHCs were costly for males and females to produce. The effect of sexual selection in isolation indicated that females preferred males with a particular CHC composition. However, the interaction between natural and sexual selection had a greater effect on the evolution of the mate recognition system than either process in isolation. When natural and sexual selection were permitted to operate in combination, male CHCs became exaggerated to a greater extent than in the presence of sexual selection alone, and female CHCs evolved against the direction of natural selection. This experiment demonstrated that the interaction between natural and sexual selection is critical in determining the direction and magnitude of the evolutionary response of the mate recognition system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061953      PMCID: PMC1691010          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test.

Authors:  M W Blows
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Theory and speciation.

Authors:  M Turelli; N H. Barton; J A. Coyne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; N H Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The costs of choice in sexual selection.

Authors:  A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1987-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Authors:  M Higgie; S Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Patterns of biosynthesis and accumulation of hydrocarbons and contact sex pheromone in the female German cockroach, Blattella germanica.

Authors:  C Schal; X Gu; E L Burns; G J Blomquist
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.698

View more
  21 in total

1.  Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Shelly Lachish; Megan Higgie; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates.

Authors:  Tracie M Ivy; Carie B Weddle; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Body size differences do not arise from divergent mate preferences in a species pair of threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Emily A Price; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Time flies: Time of day and social environment affect cuticular hydrocarbon sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Susan N Gershman; Ethan Toumishey; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  Melissa L Thomas; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata.

Authors:  Ralph W Howard; Larry L Jackson; Heidi Banse; Mark W Blows
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Epicuticular compounds of Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens: identification, quantification, and their role in female mate choice.

Authors:  Sharon Curtis; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Brooke E White; Kelly A Dyer; Howard D Rundle; Paul Mayer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Ant cuticular hydrocarbons are heritable and associated with variation in colony productivity.

Authors:  Justin Walsh; Luigi Pontieri; Patrizia d'Ettorre; Timothy A Linksvayer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.