Literature DB >> 9033328

Undertreatment and overtreatment of patients with infected antiarrhythmic implantable devices.

J E Molina1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection of implantable defibrillators or pacemakers is a serious complication, reported with increasing frequency probably because of an increase in the total number of devices implanted due to a change in trends in the treatment of arrhythmias. This review is aimed to provide guidelines on how to deal with these infections and which method is most likely to be successful.
METHODS: This is a review of 38 patients with infected antiarrhythmic implantable devices under three different plans of therapy. There were 17 implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 21 pacemakers. In 27, infection occurred after primary implantation (15 pacers, 12 implantable cardioverter defibrillators), and in 11 after replacement (six pacers, five implantable cardioverter defibrillators). Three therapeutic plans were identified. Group I (n = 12) received intravenous antibiotics without removal of the antiarrhythmic implantable device, but with relocation to a different area or plane, and with or without the use of a topical irrigating-suction system. Group II (n = 19) had complete removal of the system, 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, and implantation of a new unit followed by 10 more days of antibiotics. Group III (n = 7) underwent complete removal, 6 weeks of antibiotics, implantation of a new unit, and another 6 or more weeks of antibiotic therapy.
RESULTS: Failure occurred in 100% of cases in group I. Groups II and III had complete clearing of infection and successful reimplantation of new systems with no recurring infections. Follow-up was 8 months to 5 years. Two deaths occurred, both in group I. Hospitalization for groups I and III was 104 days and 65 days, respectively, versus 22 days for group II. No deaths occurred in group II or III.
CONCLUSIONS: With an infected antiarrhythmic implantable device, immediate removal of the entire unit is recommended, followed by 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, implantation of a new system, and 10 more days of postoperative antibiotics. This regimen is sufficient to cure the problem. No attempts should be made to save an infected system from removal because it endangers the patient's life, prolongs hospitalization, increases costs, and most likely will fail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9033328     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01033-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction by conventional traction and counter-traction technique.

Authors:  Jong Sung Park; Hui-Nam Pak; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Sung Soon Kim; Boyoung Joung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Local symptoms at the site of pacemaker implantation indicate latent systemic infection.

Authors:  D Klug; F Wallet; D Lacroix; C Marquié; C Kouakam; S Kacet; R Courcol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Successful removal of an infected pacemaker lead using cardiopulmonary bypass in an 89-year-old patient.

Authors:  Hiroomi Murayama; Takashi Watanabe; Naoki Kida; Takashi Yano; Keiji Ohara; Atsukata Kobayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Radiology of cardiac devices and their complications.

Authors:  J Dipoce; A Bernheim; H Spindola-Franco
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Endovascular extraction techniques for pacemaker and ICD lead extraction: Part 1.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 2: Complications and indications.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  Surgical management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections.

Authors:  Michael Koutentakis; Stavros Siminelakis; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Anastasios Petrou; Alexandra Petrou; Helen Priavali; Eleftheria Priavali; Andreas Mpakas; Helen Gesouli; Eleftheria Gesouli; Efstratios Apostolakis; Eleftheria Apostolakis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Paul Zarogoulidis; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Ioanna Kougioumtzi; Nikolaos Machairiotis; Theodora Tsiouda; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction by conventional traction and counter-traction technique.

Authors:  Jong Sung Park; Hui-Nam Pak; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Sung Soon Kim; Boyoung Joung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Reflections of six years of lead extraction: influence on indications and technique.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.