AIM: To compare diagnostic yield in caries diagnosis from D- and E-speed films. DESIGN: A laboratory study. SETTING: A UK dental school between 1992 and 1994. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 extracted teeth containing approximal and occlusal lesions, but representing a low caries prevalence sample, were set in occluding dental arches. Bitewing radiographs were taken and interpreted by 5 examiners for the presence or absence of caries. Each examiner was also asked which film image he or she subjectively liked best. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The teeth were subsequently sectioned and histologically examined to validate diagnostic decisions. RESULTS: For all film types the percentage of lesions with caries histologically in dentine correctly identified radiologically (sensitivity) was low (approximal caries 8-22%; occlusal caries 0-30%). The number of sound dentine sites correctly identified (specificity) was high (approximal caries 98-100%; occlusal caries 79-100%). There were no significant differences between D- and E-speed films. Sensitivity was unaffected by each examiner's subjective preference for a particular film. The variation in sensitivity of diagnosis was due to differences between examiners. CONCLUSIONS: The reluctance of many GDPs to use E-speed film because they 'do not like the image' cannot be endorsed or supported. Both E-speed film types examined can be recommended for use in general practice.
AIM: To compare diagnostic yield in caries diagnosis from D- and E-speed films. DESIGN: A laboratory study. SETTING: A UK dental school between 1992 and 1994. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 extracted teeth containing approximal and occlusal lesions, but representing a low caries prevalence sample, were set in occluding dental arches. Bitewing radiographs were taken and interpreted by 5 examiners for the presence or absence of caries. Each examiner was also asked which film image he or she subjectively liked best. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The teeth were subsequently sectioned and histologically examined to validate diagnostic decisions. RESULTS: For all film types the percentage of lesions with caries histologically in dentine correctly identified radiologically (sensitivity) was low (approximal caries 8-22%; occlusal caries 0-30%). The number of sound dentine sites correctly identified (specificity) was high (approximal caries 98-100%; occlusal caries 79-100%). There were no significant differences between D- and E-speed films. Sensitivity was unaffected by each examiner's subjective preference for a particular film. The variation in sensitivity of diagnosis was due to differences between examiners. CONCLUSIONS: The reluctance of many GDPs to use E-speed film because they 'do not like the image' cannot be endorsed or supported. Both E-speed film types examined can be recommended for use in general practice.
Authors: Michele Baffi Diniz; Jonas Almeida Rodrigues; Klaus W Neuhaus; Rita C L Cordeiro; Adrian Lussi Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Mila Janjic Rankovic; Svetlana Kapor; Yegane Khazaei; Alexander Crispin; Ina Schüler; Felix Krause; Kim Ekstrand; Stavroula Michou; Florin Eggmann; Adrian Lussi; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans; Klaus Neuhaus; Jan Kühnisch Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Jo E Frencken; Mathilde C Peters; David J Manton; Soraya C Leal; Valeria V Gordan; Ece Eden Journal: Int Dent J Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-03-15