Literature DB >> 9032513

Comparison of two different modes for noninvasive mechanical ventilation in chronic respiratory failure: volume versus pressure controlled device.

B Schönhofer1, M Sonneborn, P Haidl, H Böhrer, D Köhler.   

Abstract

The most commonly used mode of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NMV) is volume-controlled intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). Pressure support ventilation has recently become increasingly popular, but its merits have not been clearly defined. In an open, nonrandomized follow-up study, we evaluated two modes of NMV, volume-controlled (IPPV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) over 6 months in 30 consecutive patients (24 males and 6 females, aged 49 +/- 19 yrs) with chronic respiratory failure (CRF). The baseline assessments comprised both physiological and subjective data. In all cases, nasal IPPV was initially administered for 1 month, followed by a second month of nasal PCV. Thereafter, responders or nonresponders to PCV were defined according to the patients' subjective symptom score and/or the recurrence of hypercapnia. During the IPPV phase, in all but two patients the subjective and objective parameters improved significantly. During the following 1 month PCV phase, stabilization was maintained in 18 patients ("responders"), while 10 patients were defined as "nonresponders". In nonresponders, hypercapnia increased (arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2): 5.7 +/- 0.4 to 6.6 +/- 0.5 kPa; p < 0.05) and symptom scores decreased. Compared with responders, nonresponders had a lower mean nocturnal arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) (p < 0.05) and a higher daytime Pa,CO2 (p < 0.05) at baseline. We con clude that the majority of patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure who are initially satisfactorily ventilated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation may also be adequately maintained with pressure-controlled ventilation. However, there is a subgroup with more severe chronic respiratory failure at baseline, in whom pressure-controlled ventilation is inadequate. After 4 weeks of treatment with pressure-controlled ventilation, the subjective scores and the arterial carbon dioxide tension values reliably distinguished between long-term responders and nonresponders to pressure-controlled ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9032513     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  11 in total

1.  Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Randomised crossover study of pressure and volume non-invasive ventilation in chest wall deformity.

Authors:  J M Tuggey; M W Elliott
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Linear model and algorithm to automatically estimate the pressure limit of pressure controlled ventilation for delivering a target tidal volume.

Authors:  Felice Eugenio Agrò; Paolo Cappa; Salvatore Andrea Sciuto; Sergio Silvestri
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  [Non-invasive ventilation].

Authors:  T Köhnlein; T Welte
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  [Noninvasive ventilation in the intensive care unit -- is it still negligible?].

Authors:  Tobias Welte
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Long term effects of non-invasive mechanical ventilation on pulmonary haemodynamics in patients with chronic respiratory failure.

Authors:  B Schönhofer; T Barchfeld; M Wenzel; D Köhler
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Survey of non-invasive ventilation (NIPPV) in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the UK.

Authors:  M J Doherty; M A Greenstone
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Effect of non-invasive mechanical ventilation on sleep and nocturnal ventilation in patients with chronic respiratory failure.

Authors:  B Schönhofer; D Köhler
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Subjective sleep quality during average volume assured pressure support (AVAPS) ventilation in patients with hypercapnic COPD: a physiological pilot study.

Authors:  Ernesto Crisafulli; Giuseppe Manni; Marika Kidonias; Ludovico Trianni; Enrico M Clini
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 10.  Clinical review: long-term noninvasive ventilation.

Authors:  Dominique Robert; Laurent Argaud
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.