Literature DB >> 16523228

Linear model and algorithm to automatically estimate the pressure limit of pressure controlled ventilation for delivering a target tidal volume.

Felice Eugenio Agrò1, Paolo Cappa, Salvatore Andrea Sciuto, Sergio Silvestri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To theoretically assess the viability of an automatic procedure to support the anesthesiologist in properly setting mechanical ventilators when the operating conditions are switched from volume controlled to pressure controlled ventilation whilst maintaining the preset tidal volume. The procedure is based on a simple linear model of the ventilator breathing system with constant parameters and utilizes the signals gathered by the ventilator without the need to add further equipment. After a short period of stable volume controlled ventilation with the desired tidal volume, the herewith described algorithm allows the calculation of the value of pressure limit to set in pressure controlled mode which assures the previously settled tidal volume with the same breathing frequency and inspiratory-expiratory time ratio.
METHODS: The algorithm allows the online identification of the four parameters necessary for the mathematical model that are obtained by means of a direct comparison between the pressure, flow and volume waveforms generated by the model and the analog signals provided by the ventilator. The theoretical approach was validated by two different ventilators, various settings, two breathing circuits, endotracheal tubes of various sizes and two mechanical simulators of the respiratory system operating in various conditions.
RESULTS: Errors usually less than 5% (p < 0.05) on the target tidal volume were obtained for various settings typically used for adult ventilation in less than 10 s. The theoretical approach shows its limitations (errors of 10+/- 5%, p < 0.05) at high breathing frequencies (30-40 bpm) and low tidal volumes (200-300 ml).
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed theoretical approach shows the viability, for adult settings, of one of the simplest mathematical model for mechanical ventilation in order to quickly and safely switch from volume controlled to pressure controlled ventilation. The algorithm could easily be in perspective implemented in the software of the ventilator providing the anesthesiologist with an indication on the value of pressure limit to set in order to safely switch ventilation mode.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16523228     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-006-7090-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  22 in total

1.  Accuracy of deadspace free ventilatory measurements for lung function testing in ventilated newborns: a simulation study.

Authors:  B Foitzik; P Schaller; M Schmidt; G Schmalisch
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Comparison of two different modes for noninvasive mechanical ventilation in chronic respiratory failure: volume versus pressure controlled device.

Authors:  B Schönhofer; M Sonneborn; P Haidl; H Böhrer; D Köhler
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Assessment of time-domain analyses for estimation of low-frequency respiratory mechanical properties and impedance spectra.

Authors:  D W Kaczka; G M Barnas; B Suki; K R Lutchen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Analysis of the behavior of the respiratory system with constant inspiratory flow.

Authors:  J H Bates; A Rossi; J Milic-Emili
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1985-06

5.  Pressure controlled versus volume controlled ventilation with laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  G Natalini; P Facchetti; M A Dicembrini; G Lanza; A Rosano; A Bernardini
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Effects of short-term pressure-controlled ventilation on gas exchange, airway pressures, and gas distribution in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS: comparison with volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Maura Prella; François Feihl; Guido Domenighetti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: is flow waveform the difference?

Authors:  K Davis; R D Branson; R S Campbell; D T Porembka
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-11

8.  Variable ventilation improves perioperative lung function in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Boker; Craig J Haberman; Linda Girling; Randy P Guzman; George Louridas; John R Tanner; Mary Cheang; Bruce W Maycher; Dean D Bell; Greg J Doak
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The dynostatic algorithm accurately calculates alveolar pressure on-line during ventilator treatment in children.

Authors:  Soren Sondergaard; Sigurbergur Kárason; Angela Hanson; Krister Nilsson; Jan Wiklund; Stefan Lundin; Ola Stenqvist
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.556

10.  Mechanical versus manual ventilation via a face mask during the induction of anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Achim von Goedecke; Wolfgang G Voelckel; Volker Wenzel; Christoph Hörmann; Horst G Wagner-Berger; Volker Dörges; Karl H Lindner; Christian Keller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.