Literature DB >> 9030787

Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma: the influence of surgical approach and esophageal resection on cardiopulmonary function.

C A Jacobi1, H U Zieren, J M Müller, H Pichlmaier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effects of the different surgical approaches (transhiatal esophagectomy and right-sided transthoracic esophagectomy) on perioperative cardiopulmonary function in the surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma are discussed controversially and have not yet been evaluated.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study including 32 patients, we investigated the effects of the surgical approach (blunt dissection (n = 16) versus transthoracic en-bloc resection (EB) (n = 16)) in the treatment of esophagus carcinoma on perioperative cardiopulmonary function. The following parameters were measured in all patients: cardiac index (CI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT), arterio-alveolar (aaDO2), arterio-venous oxygen pressure difference (avDO2), and blood gas analyses. Time of measurement were: after induction of anesthesia, beginning and end of esophagus resection, end of surgery, 1 h postoperatively, and then every 12 h until the third postoperative day.
RESULTS: Compared to blunt dissection, en-bloc esophagectomy was found to be associated with a transient deterioration of pulmonary function during one-lung ventilation in the left-lateral position, which could already be compensated for during the intervention. No other significant differences in cardiopulmonary effects were seen between the two surgical techniques. The incidence of postoperative complications was identical in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that en-bloc resection is only associated with an increased intraoperative pulmonary strain that is completely compensated during the operation and that there is no difference in cardiopulmonary functions between the two techniques in the postoperative course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9030787     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)01106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  17 in total

Review 1.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Nadeem UlNazeer Kawoosa; Abdul Majeed Dar; Mukand Lal Sharma; Abdul Gani Ahangar; Ghulam Nabi Lone; Mohammad Akbar Bhat; Shyam Singh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  A personal perspective on controversies in the surgical management of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  J McK Manson; W D Beasley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Open surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: transhiatal vs. transthoracic, does it really matter?

Authors:  Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez; Heriberto Medina-Franco; Oscar Santes; Jesús Morales-Maza; Alejandro Alfaro-Goldaracena; Martin J Heslin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

5.  Outcome, complications, and mortality of an intrathoracic anastomosis in esophageal cancer in patients without a preoperative selection with a risk score.

Authors:  Ingo Alldinger; Leila Sisic; Marcel Hochreiter; Wilko Weichert; Susanne Blank; Maria Burian; Lars Grenacher; Tom Bruckner; Jens Werner; Markus W Büchler; Katja Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for staging and treatment of early esophageal carcinoma: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Justin T Huntington; Jon P Walker; Michael P Meara; Jeffrey W Hazey; W Scott Melvin; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Camilo Barreto; Mitchell C Posner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Total oesophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma with or without standard two field node dissection - a prospective study.

Authors:  Shishir V Shah; Yogen Pavinchandra Chheda; Sundaram Kaliappan Pillai; Shakuntala Viren Shah
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-31

9.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; C Kristian Enestvedt; Brian S Diggs; Blair A Jobe; John G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano; Satoshi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.