Literature DB >> 25350177

A personal perspective on controversies in the surgical management of oesophageal cancer.

J McK Manson1, W D Beasley.   

Abstract

Significant disagreement and debate persist regarding several aspects of the optimal surgical management of oesophageal cancer. We address some of these issues based on our consecutive series of 165 patients undergoing oesophageal resection (reported in full elsewhere) and the available literature. The areas considered are controversial but we argue in favour of a 'traditional' two-stage open approach (Ivor-Lewis), leaving the pylorus alone, making no attempt to perform a radical lymphadenectomy and fashioning a hand sewn anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350177      PMCID: PMC4474096          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13946184901605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  32 in total

1.  Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  P M Safranek; J Cubitt; M I Booth; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Chu; S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A single surgeon's series of transthoracic oesophageal resections.

Authors:  W D Beasley; M T Jefferies; J Gilmour; J McK Manson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?

Authors:  R Rindani; C J Martin; M R Cox
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-03

6.  Does systematic 2-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal malignancy offer a survival advantage? Results from 178 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D J Martin; N G Church; C W Kennedy; G L Falk
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.

Authors:  P Honkoop; P D Siersema; H W Tilanus; L P Stassen; W C Hop; M van Blankenstein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  V A Williams; T J Watson; S Zhovtis; O Gellersen; D Raymond; C Jones; J H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.

Authors:  T C Lam; M Fok; S W Cheng; J Wong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; S A Wajed; D Sanders; M W M Rucklidge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Activin A expression in esophageal carcinoma and its association with tumor aggressiveness and differentiation.

Authors:  Zhenhua Wang; Ning Zhang; Ruifeng Song; Ruitai Fan; Liuqin Yang; Liping Wu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Esophageal anastomosis - how the granulation phase of wound healing improves the incidence of anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Renata Tabola; Katarzyna Augoff; Andrzej Lewandowski; Piotr Ziolkowski; Piotr Szelachowski; Krzysztof Grabowski
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.