Literature DB >> 9028542

Bone mineral density in normal Swedish women.

O Löfman1, L Larsson, I Ross, G Toss, K Berglund.   

Abstract

We examined 429 women, aged 20-80 years, randomly selected from the population register to establish normal values for bone mineral density (BMD) in Swedish women. BMD of the spine and hip was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Hologic QDR 1000) and in the forearm by single photon absorptiometry (SPA; Molsgaard ND-1100). The recalled age of menarche was negatively correlated to BMD at all ages. There was no significant change in BMD from 20-49 years at any site except a slight decline at Ward's triangle. Bone loss was rapid at all sites during the first decade after menopause. Thereafter, BMD declined slowly in the trochanter and total hip but more rapidly in the forearm, femoral neck, and Ward's triangle. BMD in the spine even increased in the eighth decade probably due to osteoarthritis. The average change in forearm BMD during the 15 perimenopausal years comprising mean age for menopause +/- 2 SD (43-57 years) was -0.4% per year in premenopausal females and -1.6% per year in postmenopausal females. The corresponding annual percental change was, for the spine, +0.2 and -1.7; neck, -0.7 and -1.7; trochanter, +0.5 and -1.5; and Ward's triangle, -0.1% and -2.2%, respectively. Our normal values for lumbar spine BMD prior to menopause did not differ from published values or the manufacturer's normal values; however, our spine BMD values for the first decade after menopause were significantly lower (approximately 10%) than in other studies. Our femoral neck BMD values for younger women were, like those of several other groups, significantly lower than the manufacturer's normal values, but our sample of young women in this study was small. The prevalence of osteoporosis, if defined as t score < -2.5 is highly dependent on the sampling of the reference population of young adult women, and also on the choice of skeletal site. Further studies on bone mineral density in healthy young adult women are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028542     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00345-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  12 in total

1.  Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; C Cepollaro; A Del Puente; S Giannini; S Gonnelli; D Maggio; C Marcocci; S Minisola; E Palummeri; M Rossini; L Sartori; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Amount of bone loss in relation to time around the final menstrual period and follicle-stimulating hormone staging of the transmenopause.

Authors:  MaryFran R Sowers; Huiyong Zheng; Mary L Jannausch; Daniel McConnell; Bin Nan; Sioban Harlow; John F Randolph
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Physical activity in the prevention and amelioration of osteoporosis in women : interaction of mechanical, hormonal and dietary factors.

Authors:  Katarina T Borer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Development and validation of a disease model for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Gauthier; J A Kanis; M Martin; J Compston; F Borgström; C Cooper; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Height loss, forearm bone density and bone loss in menopausal women: a 15-year prospective study. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway.

Authors:  S Forsmo; H M Hvam; M L Rea; S E Lilleeng; B Schei; A Langhammer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Endogenous hormones and bone turnover markers in pre- and perimenopausal women: SWAN.

Authors:  M R Sowers; G A Greendale; I Bondarenko; J S Finkelstein; J A Cauley; R M Neer; B Ettinger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Population-based reference values for bone mineral density in young men.

Authors:  M Høiberg; T L Nielsen; K Wraae; B Abrahamsen; C Hagen; M Andersen; K Brixen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women.

Authors:  Selma Cvijetić; Mirko Korsić
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Adult Consequences of Self-Limited Delayed Puberty.

Authors:  Jia Zhu; Yee-Ming Chan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.