Literature DB >> 20700580

Development and validation of a disease model for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

A Gauthier1, J A Kanis, M Martin, J Compston, F Borgström, C Cooper, E McCloskey.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This article describes the development of a model for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) based on Swedish data that is easily adaptable to other countries.
INTRODUCTION: The aims of the study were to develop and validate a model to describe the current/future burden of PMO in different national settings.
METHODS: For validation purposes, the model was developed using Swedish data and provides estimates from 1990. For each year of the study, the "incident cohort" (women experiencing a first osteoporotic fracture) was identified and run through a Markov model using 1-year cycles until 2020. Health states were based on the number of fractures and death. Fracture by site (hip, vertebral, and non-hip non-vertebral) was tracked for each health state. Transition probabilities reflected site-specific risk of death and subsequent fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) was included as a model output; model inputs included population size and life tables from 1970 to 2020, incidence of fracture, relative risk of subsequent fractures based on prior fracture, relative risk of death following a fracture by site, and BMD by age (mean and standard deviation).
RESULTS: Model predictions averaged across age groups estimated the incidence of hip, vertebral, and other osteoporotic fractures within a 5% margin of error versus published data. In Sweden, the number of osteoporotic fractures is expected to rise by 11.5% between 2009 and 2020, with a shift towards more vertebral fractures and multiple fractures.
CONCLUSION: The current PMO disease model is easily adaptable to other countries, providing a consistent measure of present and future burden of PMO in different settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700580     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1358-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

1.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Bone mineral normative data in Malmö, Sweden. Comparison with reference data and hip fracture incidence in other ethnic groups.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; K Akesson; K J Obrant
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1993-04

4.  Mortality after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Excess mortality after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  What is the true mortality of hip fractures?

Authors:  M J Parker; J K Anand
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.427

7.  Mortality and pulmonary embolism after fracture in the elderly.

Authors:  Jane A Barrett; John A Baron; Michael L Beach
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The components of excess mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; B Jonsson; A K Oglesby
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Incidence of hip fractures in Malmö, Sweden (1950-1991).

Authors:  B Gullberg; H Duppe; B Nilsson; I Redlund-Johnell; I Sernbo; K Obrant; O Johnell
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995-2004: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Icks; B Haastert; M Wildner; C Becker; G Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Wilson; C A Sharp; M W J Davie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.

Authors:  N C W Harvey; E V McCloskey; P J Mitchell; B Dawson-Hughes; D D Pierroz; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.

Authors:  Rafael Azagra; Genís Roca; Gloria Encabo; Amada Aguyé; Marta Zwart; Sílvia Güell; Núria Puchol; Emili Gene; Enrique Casado; Pilar Sancho; Silvia Solà; Pere Torán; Milagros Iglesias; Maria Carmen Gisbert; Francesc López-Expósito; Jesús Pujol-Salud; Yolanda Fernandez-Hermida; Ana Puente; Mireia Rosàs; Vicente Bou; Juan José Antón; Gustavo Lansdberg; Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez; Adolf Díez-Pérez; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.