Literature DB >> 9028245

Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future.

G J Mount1.   

Abstract

It was Michael Buonocore who focused the attention of the profession on adhesion in the oral cavity. He expanded the concept of adhesion of resins to enamel and investigated adhesion to dentin. The problem has been solved through the glass-ionomer cements rather than with resins, but sadly, he did not live to see them achieve maturity. The glass-ionomer cements were introduced to the profession in 1976, and they provide adhesion to both enamel and dentin through an ion exchange with the additional benefit of a continuing fluoride release throughout the life of the restoration. Solubility is low, abrasion resistance is high, and biocompatability is excellent. As a water-based material, they have an excellent chance of survival in the hostile environment of the oral cavity. Acceptance of the early versions was slow because of perceived problems with water exchange, a poor color range, and a lack of translucency. Considerable research has been carried out over the last 20 years by members of the profession and the manufacturers; at this point, the glass-ionomer cements make a very valuable contribution to everyday practice. They are now available as both an autocure and a dual-cure cement, and the color range and translucency are excellent. Problems of clinical placement have been overcome, and it is now a simple matter to take advantage of the adhesion and the fluoride release and place a restoration that is esthetic, resistant to microleakage, long lasting, and a deterent to recurrent caries. Their only limitation lies in the fact that they lack the fracture strength to rebuild marginal ridges and incisal corners. In spite of this limitation, they have opened the way for the introduction of a new range of microcavity designs that allow for conservation of remaining tooth structure to an extent never before available. In the near future physical properties will be improved still further, and the use of these cements will expand considerably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 9028245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents.

Authors:  Julius Zoergiebel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Raman spectroscopic study of noncarious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Rangsima Sakoolnamarka; Michael F Burrow; Steven Prawer; Martin J Tyas
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sema Seval Oztas; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.

Authors:  S M Liebmann; P G Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effect of Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on the Micro Push-out Bond Strength of a Fibre Glass Dowel.

Authors:  Olimpia Crispim da Silveira; Rodivan Bras da Silva; Fabio Roberto Dametto; Claudia Tavares Machado; Alex Jose Souza Dos Santos; Alessandro Leite Cavalcanti
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-03

6.  Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel; Anca Silvia Valceanu; Karin Christine Huth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Effect of adhesive system application for cavities prepared with erbium, chromium: yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser on rat dental pulp tissue.

Authors:  Mayo Takada; Masaya Suzuki; Maiko Haga-Tsujimura; Koichi Shinkai
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Clinical Performance of Viscous Glass Ionomer Cement in Posterior Cavities over Two Years.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Norbert Krämer
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-02-22

9.  In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers.

Authors:  Kishore Kumar Majety; Madhu Pujar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

Review 10.  Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of direct and indirect pulp capping materials.

Authors:  Karin Cristina da Silva Modena; Leslie Caroll Casas-Apayco; Maria Teresa Atta; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa; Josimeri Hebling; Carla Renata Sipert; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro; Carlos Ferreira Santos
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.