Literature DB >> 10546417

In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.

S M Liebmann1, P G Jost-Brinkmann.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate different light-cured and chemically cured resin-modified glass ionomer cements used for the cementation of orthodontic bands and to analyze various factors influencing the adhesive strength between enamel, cement and stainless steel. Four resin-modified glass ionomers (Fuji Ortho LC/GC, Fuji Duet/GC, Unitek Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer Orthodontic Band Cement/3M Unitek, Vitremer/3M) and 1 compomer (Band-Lok/Reliance) were examined. Flattened and polished bovine teeth embedded in polyurethane resin were used as enamel specimens. Before cementation, 50% of the specimens were moistened with the aerosol of an inhalation device, while the rest were dried with compressed air. Stainless steel cylinders (CrNi 18 10) were perpendicularly bonded onto the polished enamel using a custom-made cementation device and immediately topped with a pressure of 0.25 MPa. The cement was isolated with either Ketac Glaze/ESPE, Fuji Coat/GC, Cacao Butter/GC, Dryfoil/Jalenko or Final Varnish/VOCO, or was left uncoated. Eight minutes after the beginning of mixing, either the surplus cement was removed with a scalpel or surplus removal was simulated with ultrasound. After 24 hours storage in a water bath at 37 degrees C and 1,000 thermocycles the shear bond strength was determined. Significant differences with respect to the shear bond strength were found among the following cements, ranking from highest to lowest: Fuji Duet, Unitek cement > Fuji Ortho LC > Vitremer > Band-Lok. The application of a barrier coating significantly increased the shear bond strength of all cements except Fuji Ortho LC. The light-cured resin Ketac Glaze proved to be the most effective barrier coating. A dry enamel surface increased the bond strength of all investigated cements except Unitek cement. The use of ultrasound led to no significant reduction in shear bond strength in comparison with surplus removal with a scalpel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546417     DOI: 10.1007/bf01301247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  26 in total

1.  Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  A D Wilson
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements: the setting reaction.

Authors:  A M Bourke; A W Walls; J F McCabe
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of the shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer and a chemically cured glass ionomer for use as an orthodontic bonding agent.

Authors:  A M Compton; C E Meyers; S O Hondrum; L Lorton
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  [Effect of different enamel structures on bonding of glass ionomer cements].

Authors:  H Fischer-Brandies; G Kluge; J Theusner
Journal:  Prakt Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-03

5.  Barcoll hardness of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and a compomer.

Authors:  P F Abate; M A Polack; R L Macchi
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Bond strength of visible light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic cement.

Authors:  S B Jobalia; R M Valente; W G de Rijk; E A BeGole; C A Evans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Erosion and compressive strength of hybrid glass ionomer cements when light activated or chemically set.

Authors:  A M Hegarty; G J Pearson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  M F McCarthy; S O Hondrum
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Short-term contamination of luting cements by water and saliva.

Authors:  P Mojon; R Kaltio; D Feduik; E B Hawbolt; M I MacEntee
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Depth of cure of resin-modified glass ionomers.

Authors:  E J Swift; M A Pawlus; M A Vargas; D Fortin
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.