Literature DB >> 22549662

Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents.

Julius Zoergiebel1, Nicoleta Ilie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study focused on a recently launched conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) with a particular chemical formulation of both, filler and acrylic liquid, by analysing its mechanical behaviour in comparison to three conventional GICs. Furthermore, the effect of resin coating and storage conditions was evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three commercially available GICs were chosen: Riva Self Cure (SDI), Fuji IX Fast (GC) and Fuji IX GP Extra/Equia (GC). Additionally a newly developed zinc-containing GIC--ChemFil Rock (Dentsply)--was tested. Mechanical properties were determined at macro- [flexural strength (FS) and modulus of elasticity (E (flexural))] and micro-scale [Vickers hardness (VH) and indentation modulus (E)] after storing coated and uncoated specimens in artificial saliva and distilled water for 7 and 30 days.
RESULTS: ChemFil Rock revealed the highest FS, but the lowest VH and E. The micro-mechanical properties of the analysed GICs did neither benefit from the new zinc formulation nor from resin coating. A resin coating is nevertheless a valuable support for GIC fillings, since it offers the absence of visible surface defects like crazing and voids, and thus, it led to significant improvements in flexural strength. This statement is also valid for ChemFil Rock, contrary to manufacture recommendation. The impact of storage agent and storage duration on the measured properties was low.
CONCLUSIONS: The new development (ChemFil Rock) might represent a promising approach regarding longevity of GIC fillings in molar regions, due to the high flexural strength and the absence of visible surface defects like crazing and voids. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All GICs should receive surface protection in order to perform their maximum in stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22549662     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0733-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Long-term flexural strength of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  G J Pearson; A S Atkinson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 2. Effect of the powder: liquid ratio on the physical properties.

Authors:  S Crisp; B G Lewis; A D Wilson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The influence of polyacid molecular weight on some properties of glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  A D Wilson; R G Hill; C P Warrens; B G Lewis
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Early strength of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  M A Cattani-Lorente; C Godin; J M Meyer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Effectiveness of glass-ionomer surface protection treatments: a scanning optical microscope study.

Authors:  T Watson; A Banerjee
Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent       Date:  1993-12

6.  Novel polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) dental cements based on zinc silicate glasses.

Authors:  M Darling; R Hill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.

Authors:  M A Naasan; T F Watson
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.522

8.  Synthesis and characterization of a novel N-vinylcaprolactam-containing acrylic acid terpolymer for applications in glass-ionomer dental cements.

Authors:  Alireza Moshaverinia; Nima Roohpour; Jawwad A Darr; Ihtesham U Rehman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  The effect of storage in aqueous solutions on glass-ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate dental cements.

Authors:  J W Nicholson; A D Wilson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel.

Authors:  Eileen A Glasspoole; Robert L Erickson; Carel L Davidson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effect of heat application on the mechanical behaviour of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Ulrike Menne-Happ; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sema Seval Oztas; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.

Authors:  Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; Vellore K Gopinath; Spiros Zinelis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The effect of resin coating on the shear punch strength of restorative glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Raphael Pilo; Ariel Ben-Amar; Anna Barnea; Yaron Blasbalg; Shifra Levartovsky
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Stored in Different Storage Media over Time.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Faridi; Abdul Khabeer; Saad Haroon
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  Effect of a novel glass ionomer cement containing fluoro-zinc-silicate fillers on biofilm formation and dentin ion incorporation.

Authors:  Taisuke Hasegawa; Shoji Takenaka; Tatsuya Ohsumi; Takako Ida; Hayato Ohshima; Yutaka Terao; Traithawit Naksagoon; Takeyasu Maeda; Yuichiro Noiri
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Modification of glass-ionomer cement properties by quaternized chitosan-coated nanoparticles.

Authors:  Enas A Elshenawy; Manal Ahmed El-Ebiary; El-Refaie Kenawy; Gehan Abdelmonem El-Olimy
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.885

8.  How mobile are protons in the structure of dental glass ionomer cements?

Authors:  Ana R Benetti; Johan Jacobsen; Benedict Lehnhoff; Niels C R Momsen; Denis V Okhrimenko; Mark T F Telling; Nikolay Kardjilov; Markus Strobl; Tilo Seydel; Ingo Manke; Heloisa N Bordallo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART).

Authors:  Gustavo Fabián Molina; Ricardo Juan Cabral; Ignacio Mazzola; Laura Brain Lascano; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 10.  Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics.

Authors:  Shariq Najeeb; Zohaib Khurshid; Muhammad Sohail Zafar; Abdul Samad Khan; Sana Zohaib; Juan Manuel Nuñez Martí; Salvatore Sauro; Jukka Pekka Matinlinna; Ihtesham Ur Rehman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.