Literature DB >> 9023792

Comparing correlated kappas by resampling: is one level of agreement significantly different from another?

D P McKenzie1, A J Mackinnon, N Péladeau, P Onghena, P C Bruce, D M Clarke, S Harrigan, P D McGorry.   

Abstract

Researchers comparing diagnostic systems or screening tests frequently need to compare indices of agreement such as the kappa coefficient. While asymptotic methods exist for comparing kappas derived from independent samples, no satisfactory approach exists for comparing kappas derived from the same or related samples. Resampling methods for comparing kappa coefficients obtained from the same sample are presented. Easily undertaken using readily available software, these methods are illustrated by application to a small sample of psychiatric data, as well as to several thousand samples of simulated data. An acceptable type I error rate was exhibited. Resampling techniques-easily implemented and making few assumptions-deserve wider application in psychiatric research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9023792     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00033-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  16 in total

1.  Testing the Difference of Correlated Agreement Coefficients for Statistical Significance.

Authors:  Kilem L Gwet
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Inter-rater reliability of the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in the examination of the knee.

Authors:  Sean Willis; Richard Rosedale; Ravi Rastogi; Shawn M Robbins
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09-07

3.  Method matters: Understanding diagnostic reliability in DSM-IV and DSM-5.

Authors:  Michael Chmielewski; Lee Anna Clark; R Michael Bagby; David Watson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-08

4.  A paired kappa to compare binary ratings across two medical tests.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Rating motivational interviewing fidelity from thin slices.

Authors:  Derek D Caperton; David C Atkins; Zac E Imel
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2018-05-03

6.  Kappa statistic for clustered dichotomous responses from physicians and patients.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Bahjat Qaqish; Jane Monaco; Stacey L Sheridan; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Tracking of physical activity and inactivity in middle school girls.

Authors:  Chris D Baggett; June Stevens; Robert G McMurray; Kelly R Evenson; David M Murray; Diane J Catellier; Ka He
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy and quality of life evaluations in hospitalized cirrhotic patients in China.

Authors:  Ji-Yao Wang; Ning-Ping Zhang; Bao-Rong Chi; Yu-Qing Mi; Li-Na Meng; Ying-Di Liu; Jiang-Bin Wang; Hai-Xing Jiang; Jin-Hui Yang; Yun Xu; Xiao Li; Jian-Ming Xu; Guo Zhang; Xin-Min Zhou; Yu-Zheng Zhuge; De-An Tian; Jin Ye; Yu-Lan Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale certification is reliable across multiple venues.

Authors:  Patrick Lyden; Rema Raman; Lin Liu; Marian Emr; Margo Warren; John Marler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Novel fluorescein angiography-based computer-aided algorithm for assessment of retinal vessel permeability.

Authors:  Yonatan Serlin; Geva Tal; Yoash Chassidim; Yisrael Parmet; Oren Tomkins; Boris Knyazer; Alon Friedman; Jaime Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.