Literature DB >> 23533082

Kappa statistic for clustered dichotomous responses from physicians and patients.

Chaeryon Kang1, Bahjat Qaqish, Jane Monaco, Stacey L Sheridan, Jianwen Cai.   

Abstract

The bootstrap method for estimating the standard error of the kappa statistic in the presence of clustered data is evaluated. Such data arise, for example, in assessing agreement between physicians and their patients regarding their understanding of the physician-patient interaction and discussions. We propose a computationally efficient procedure for generating correlated dichotomous responses for physicians and assigned patients for simulation studies. The simulation result demonstrates that the proposed bootstrap method produces better estimate of the standard error and better coverage performance compared with the asymptotic standard error estimate that ignores dependence among patients within physicians with at least a moderately large number of clusters. We present an example of an application to a coronary heart disease prevention study.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster bootstrap resampling; Clustered dichotomous responses; Kappa statistic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23533082      PMCID: PMC3844626          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

1.  Weighted least-squares approach for comparing correlated kappa.

Authors:  Huiman X Barnhart; John M Williamson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Bootstrap analysis of multivariate failure time data.

Authors:  Jane Monaco; Jianwen Cai; James Grizzle
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Application of the McNemar test to non-independent matched pair data.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Estimating kappa from binocular data.

Authors:  N L Oden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comparing correlated kappas by resampling: is one level of agreement significantly different from another?

Authors:  D P McKenzie; A J Mackinnon; N Péladeau; P Onghena; P C Bruce; D M Clarke; S Harrigan; P D McGorry
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Patient-physician agreement on the content of CHD prevention discussions.

Authors:  Lindy Behrend; Hossein Maymani; Megan Diehl; Ziya Gizlice; Jianwen Cai; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The kappa coefficient of agreement for multiple observers when the number of subjects is small.

Authors:  S T Gross
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Estimating kappa from binocular data and comparing marginal probabilities.

Authors:  H J Schouten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The design of simulation studies in medical statistics.

Authors:  Andrea Burton; Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston; Roger L Holder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A randomized trial of an intervention to improve use and adherence to effective coronary heart disease prevention strategies.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy B Draeger; Michael P Pignone; Thomas C Keyserling; Ross J Simpson; Barbara Rimer; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Jianwen Cai; Ziya Gizlice
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU: Valid and Reliable Delirium Monitoring for Critically Ill Infants and Children.

Authors:  Heidi A B Smith; Maalobeeka Gangopadhyay; Christina M Goben; Natalie L Jacobowski; Mary Hamilton Chestnut; Shane Savage; Michael T Rutherford; Danica Denton; Jennifer L Thompson; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Michelle Acton; Jessica Newman; Hannah P Noori; Michelle K Terrell; Stacey R Williams; Katherine Griffith; Timothy J Cooper; E Wesley Ely; D Catherine Fuchs; Pratik P Pandharipande
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Kappa statistic to measure agreement beyond chance in free-response assessments.

Authors:  Marc Carpentier; Christophe Combescure; Laura Merlini; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Comparing dependent kappa coefficients obtained on multilevel data.

Authors:  Sophie Vanbelle
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Asymptotic variability of (multilevel) multirater kappa coefficients.

Authors:  Sophie Vanbelle
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  The value of MRI compared to conventional radiography in analysing morphologic changes in the spine in axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Gabriel Adelsmayr; Andreas Haidmayer; Christopher Spreizer; Michael Janisch; Franz Quehenberger; Eva Klocker; Winfried Graninger; Michael Fuchsjäger; Josef Hermann
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-12-11

6.  Validation of the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale: a patient-reported outcome measure of vitiligo treatment success.

Authors:  J M Batchelor; W Tan; S Tour; A Yong; A A Montgomery; K S Thomas
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Comparing assessment of diabetes-related quality of life between patients and their physicians.

Authors:  Orly Tamir; Nitzan Shabo De-Paz; David Dvir; Anthony D Heymann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.