Literature DB >> 19520998

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale certification is reliable across multiple venues.

Patrick Lyden1, Rema Raman, Lin Liu, Marian Emr, Margo Warren, John Marler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale certification is required for participation in modern stroke clinical trials and as part of good clinical care in stroke centers. A new training and demonstration DVD was produced to replace existing training and certification videotapes. Previously, this DVD, with 18 patients representing all possible scores on 15 scale items, was shown to be reliable among expert users. The DVD is now the standard for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale training, but the videos have not been validated among general (ie, nonexpert) users.
METHODS: We sought to measure interrater reliability of the certification DVD among general users using methodology previously published for the DVD. All raters who used the DVD certification through the American Heart Association web site were included in this study. Each rater evaluated one of 3 certification groups.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 8214 raters overall, 7419 raters using the Internet and 795 raters using other venues. Among raters from other venues, 33% of all responses came from registered nurses, 23% from emergency department MD/other emergency department/other physicians, and 44% from neurologists. Half (51%) of raters were previously National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-certified and 93% were from the United States/Canada. Item responses were tabulated, scoring performed as previously published, and agreement measured with unweighted kappa coefficients for individual items and an intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall score. In addition, agreement in this study was compared with the agreement obtained in the original DVD validation study to determine if there were differences between novice and experienced users. Kappas ranged from 0.15 (ataxia) to 0.81 (Item 1c, Level of Consciousness-commands [LOCC] questions). Of 15 items, 2 showed poor, 11 moderate, and 2 excellent agreement based on kappa scores. Agreement was slightly lower to that obtained from expert users for LOCC, best gaze, visual fields, facial weakness, motor left arm, motor right arm, and sensory loss. The intraclass correlation coefficient for total score was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.90). Reliability scores were similar among specialists and there were no major differences between nurses and physicians, although scores tended to be lower for neurologists and trended higher among raters not previously certified. Scores were similar across various certification settings.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that certification using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke DVDs is robust and surprisingly reliable for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale certification across multiple venues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520998      PMCID: PMC2726278          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  9 in total

1.  Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial.

Authors:  L B Goldstein; G P Samsa
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Comparing correlated kappas by resampling: is one level of agreement significantly different from another?

Authors:  D P McKenzie; A J Mackinnon; N Péladeau; P Onghena; P C Bruce; D M Clarke; S Harrigan; P D McGorry
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators.

Authors:  P Lyden; M Lu; C Jackson; J Marler; R Kothari; T Brott; J Zivin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale.

Authors:  L B Goldstein; C Bertels; J N Davis
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1989-06

5.  NIHSS training and certification using a new digital video disk is reliable.

Authors:  Patrick Lyden; Rema Raman; Lin Liu; James Grotta; Joseph Broderick; Scott Olson; Sandi Shaw; Judith Spilker; Brett Meyer; Marian Emr; Margo Warren; John Marler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. Brain Attack Coalition.

Authors:  M J Alberts; G Hademenos; R E Latchaw; A Jagoda; J R Marler; M R Mayberg; R D Starke; H W Todd; K M Viste; M Girgus; T Shephard; M Emr; P Shwayder; M D Walker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Primary stroke center: basic components and recommendations.

Authors:  Yousef M Mohammad; Afshin A Divani; Hoda Jradi; Haithm M Hussein; Amardeep Hoonjan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group.

Authors:  P Lyden; T Brott; B Tilley; K M Welch; E J Mascha; S Levine; E C Haley; J Grotta; J Marler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Ensuring reliability of outcome measures in multicenter clinical trials of treatments for acute ischemic stroke. The program developed for the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST).

Authors:  M A Albanese; W R Clarke; H P Adams; R F Woolson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.914

  9 in total
  28 in total

1.  Emergency and critical care management of acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen A Figueroa; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Stroke: Haemorrhage risk after thrombolysis--the SEDAN score.

Authors:  Patrick D Lyden
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Training and Certifying Users of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Authors:  Ariana Anderson; John Klein; Brian White; Marianne Bourgeois; Anne Leonard; Al Pacino; John Hill; Patrick Lyden
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Hyperacute management of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Sarah Song
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  Good outcome rate of 35% in IV-tPA-treated patients with computed tomography angiography confirmed severe anterior circulation occlusive stroke.

Authors:  R Gilberto González; Karen L Furie; Gregory V Goldmacher; Wade S Smith; Shervin Kamalian; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Gordon J Harris; Elkan F Halpern; Walter J Koroshetz; Erica C S Camargo; William P Dillon; Michael H Lev
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Optimal end points for acute stroke therapy trials: best ways to measure treatment effects of drugs and devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Implementation of a stroke self-management program: A randomized controlled pilot study of veterans with stroke.

Authors:  Teresa M Damush; Susan Ofner; Zhangsheng Yu; Laurie Plue; Gloria Nicholas; Linda S Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in centenarians.

Authors:  B Baena Álvarez; S García-Madrona; R Sainz Amo; F Rodríguez Jorge; J Gómez Corral; R Vera Lechuga; M C Matute Lozano; A Sánchez Sánchez; A De Felipe Mimbrera; A Cruz Culebras; J Masjuan Vallejo
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Validity and reliability of a korean version of the national institutes of health stroke scale.

Authors:  Mi Sun Oh; Kyung-Ho Yu; Ju-Hun Lee; San Jung; Im-Suck Ko; Joon-Hyun Shin; Soo-Jin Cho; Hui-Chul Choi; Hyang Hee Kim; Byung-Chul Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  The effect of a locally adapted, secondary stroke risk factor self-management program on medication adherence among veterans with stroke/TIA.

Authors:  Teresa M Damush; Laura Myers; Jane A Anderson; Zhangsheng Yu; Susan Ofner; Gloria Nicholas; Barbara Kimmel; Arlene A Schmid; Thomas Kent; Linda S Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.