Literature DB >> 9021510

Enhanced stability of uncemented canine femoral components by bone ingrowth into the porous coatings.

M Jasty1, C R Bragdon, E Zalenski, D O'Connor, A Page, W H Harris.   

Abstract

The following questions were answered in this study: (1) What is the initial stability of proximally porous-coated canine femoral components? (2) Does bone ingrowth occur under these conditions? (3) Is the stability enhanced by tissue ingrowth in vivo? The stability of proximally porous-coated femoral components of canine total hip arthroplasties after 6 months to 2 years of in vivo service in dogs was measured in vitro using displacement transducers under loads simulating canine midstance. This was compared with the stability of identical components under the same loading conditions immediately after implantation in vitro in the contralateral femurs. The femurs were then sectioned and bone ingrowth into the porous coatings was quantified. The results showed that immediately after implantation the implants can move as much as 50 microns, but that the bone ingrowth into porous coatings of canine femoral components can occur even under such conditions. These data also suggested that the relative motion existing at the time of insertion can be reduced to very small amounts (< 10 microns) by bone ingrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9021510     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90055-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Pancanti; M Dotti; F Traina; L Cristofolini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Numerical model to predict the long-term mechanical stability of cementless orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  M Viceconti; S Ricci; A Pancanti; A Cappello
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Effect of a collar on subsidence and local micromotion of cementless femoral stems: in vitro comparative study based on micro-computerised tomography.

Authors:  Valérie Malfroy Camine; Hannes A Rüdiger; Dominique P Pioletti; Alexandre Terrier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Partial weightbearing is not necessary after cementless total hip arthroplasty: a two-year prospective randomized study on 100 patients.

Authors:  Max Markmiller; Thomas Weiss; Peter Kreuz; Axel Rüter; Gerhard Konrad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: radiological and clinical result using an eccentric glenosphere.

Authors:  Carlo Felice De Biase; Marco Delcogliano; Mario Borroni; A Castagna
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-04-20

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: Influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone-implant interaction.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Brett D Steineman; Daniel R Sturnick; Jonathan T Deland; Constantine A Demetracopoulos; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Kathleen N Meyers; Nicholas Schraut; Kapil G Mehrotra; Joseph D Lipman; Timothy M Wright; Michael P Ast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Dynamic RSA for the evaluation of inducible micromotion of Oxford UKA during step-up and step-down motion.

Authors:  Kristian Horsager; Bart L Kaptein; Lone Rømer; Peter B Jørgensen; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.