Literature DB >> 9015202

Ultraviolet microbeam irradiations of epithelial and spermatocyte spindles suggest that forces act on the kinetochore fibre and are not generated by its disassembly.

T Spurck1, A Forer, J Pickett-Heaps.   

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) microbeam irradiations of crane-fly spermatocyte and newt epithelial spindles severed kinetochore fibres (KT-fibres), creating areas of reduced birefringence (ARBs): the remnant KT-fibre consists of two "stubs," a pole-stub attached to the pole and a KT-stub attached to the kinetochore. KT-stubs remained visible but pole-stubs soon became undetectable [Forer et al., 1996]. At metaphase, in both cell types the KT-stub often changed orientation immediately after irradiation and its tip steadily moved poleward. In spermatocytes, the chromosome attached to the KT-stub remained at the equator as the KT-stub elongated. In epithelial cells, the KT-stub sometimes elongated as the associated chromosome remained at the equator; other times the associated chromosome moved poleward together with the KT-stub, albeit only a short distance toward the pole. When an ARB was generated at anaphase, chromosome(s) with a KT-stub often continued to move poleward. In spermatocytes, this movement was accompanied by steady elongation of the KT-stub. In epithelial cells, chromosomes accelerated polewards after irradiation until the KT-stubs reached the pole, after which chromosome movement returned to normal speeds. In some epithelial cells fine birefringent fibres by chance were present along one edge of ARBs; these remnant fibres buckled and broke as the KT-stub and chromosome moved polewards. Similarly, KT-stubs that moved into pole stubs (or astral fibres) caused the pole stubs (or astral fibres) to bend sharply from the point of impact. Our results contradict models of chromosome movement that postulate that force is generated by the kinetochore disassembling the KT-fibre. Instead, these results suggest that poleward directed forces act on the KT-fibre and the KT-stub and suggest that continuity of microtubules between kinetochore and pole is not obligatory for achieving anaphase motion to the pole.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9015202     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)36:2<136::AID-CM4>3.0.CO;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton        ISSN: 0886-1544


  19 in total

1.  Evidence that kinetochore fibre microtubules shorten predominantly at the pole in anaphase flea-beetle spermatocytes.

Authors:  A Forer; P J Wilson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Pac-Man does not resolve the enduring problem of anaphase chromosome movement.

Authors:  J D Pickett-Heaps; A Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Microtubule plus-end dynamics in Xenopus egg extract spindles.

Authors:  Jennifer S Tirnauer; E D Salmon; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 5.  The perpetual movements of anaphase.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Mariana Lince-Faria
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Mitosis: spindle evolution and the matrix model.

Authors:  Jeremy Pickett-Heaps; Art Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.356

7.  What generates flux of tubulin in kinetochore microtubules?

Authors:  Arthur Forer; Jeremy D Pickett-Heaps; Tim Spurck
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 8.  Do nuclear envelope and intranuclear proteins reorganize during mitosis to form an elastic, hydrogel-like spindle matrix?

Authors:  Kristen M Johansen; Arthur Forer; Changfu Yao; Jack Girton; Jørgen Johansen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Movement of chromosomes with severed kinetochore microtubules.

Authors:  Arthur Forer; Kristen M Johansen; Jørgen Johansen
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.356

10.  Distance segregation of sex chromosomes in crane-fly spermatocytes studied using laser microbeam irradiations.

Authors:  Arthur Forer; Jessica Ferraro-Gideon; Michael Berns
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 3.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.