Literature DB >> 9185430

Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

S Ahmedzai1, D Brooks.   

Abstract

Cancer patients requiring strong opioid analgesia (n = 202; mean age, 61.5 years; range, 18-89 years; 55% men) were recruited from 38 United Kingdom palliative care centers into a randomized, open, two-period, crossover study comparing transdermal fentanyl with sustained-release oral morphine. Patients received one treatment for 15 days followed immediately by the other for 15 days. Daily diaries were completed. Both treatments appeared equally effective in terms of pain control, as assessed by the Memorial Pain Assessment Card and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) pain scores. Fentanyl was associated with significantly less constipation (p < 0.001) and less daytime drowsiness (p = 0.015) but greater sleep disturbance (p = 0.004) and shorter sleep duration (p = 0.008) than morphine. The World Health Organization (WHO) performance status and EORTC global quality of life scores showed no significant difference between treatment groups. Of those patients who were able to express a preference (n = 136), significantly more preferred the fentanyl patches (p = 0.037). We conclude that, in this study, transdermal fentanyl provided pain relief that was acceptable to cancer patients and was associated with less constipation and sedation than morphine. These reduced side effects may contribute to patients preference for the patches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9185430     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00082-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  80 in total

Review 1.  Alternative opioids to morphine in palliative care: a review of current practice and evidence.

Authors:  M Barnett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  [Strong opioids and constipation].

Authors:  A Schwarzer; F Nauck; E Klaschik
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 3.  Strong opioids in pediatric palliative medicine.

Authors:  Richard D W Hain; Angela Miser; Mary Devins; W Hamish B Wallace
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  The role of opioids in cancer pain.

Authors:  Columba Quigley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-08

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacology of analgesic medicines in older people: impact of frailty and cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Andrew J McLachlan; Sally Bath; Vasi Naganathan; Sarah N Hilmer; David G Le Couteur; Stephen J Gibson; Fiona M Blyth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Prostate cancer pain management: EAU guidelines on pain management.

Authors:  Pia Bader; Dieter Echtle; Valerie Fonteyne; Kostas Livadas; Gert De Meerleer; Alvaro Paez Borda; Eleni G Papaioannou; Jan H Vranken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Strategies for the treatment of cancer pain in the new millennium.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; E D Dickerson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Opioids in people with cancer-related pain.

Authors:  Columba Quigley
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-07-31

Review 9.  Underutilisation of opioids in elderly patients with chronic pain: approaches to correcting the problem.

Authors:  Kirsten Auret; Stephan A Schug
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Olav Bjorneboe; Ute Richarz
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.