Literature DB >> 9010387

Use of low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin), once daily, for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A feasibility and health economic study in an outpatient setting. Swedish Venous Thrombosis Dalteparin Trial Group.

P Lindmarker1, M Holmström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the safety and feasibility of treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in an outpatient setting, using the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin, to calculate the potential and actual cost reductions achievable as a result of such a treatment regimen.
DESIGN: An open, nonrandomized, multicentre trial.
SETTING: Fourteen hospitals in central Sweden.
SUBJECTS: Ambulant patients, aged 18 years or older. with symptomatic DVT in the leg, diagnosed using phlebography or ultrasound (Duplex-Doppler).
INTERVENTIONS: Dalteparin (Fragmin) at a fixed dose of 200 i.u. kg-1 body weight, was administered once daily subcutaneously for at least 4 consecutive days. Treatment with warfarin was initiated from the first day of dalteparin administration. Outpatient treatment was encouraged whenever possible Financial calculations were performed independently at two hospitals, giving an average cost for all actions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Increasing severity of symptoms (or thromboembolic recurrences during the 3-months follow-up period), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding events, and death during the initial phase and follow-up period.
RESULTS: Of 434 patients, 35% and 64% were treated in hospital within 24 and 72 h, respectively, and thereafter as outpatients. The overall frequency of serious complications was 0.92% (exact 95% confidence interval, 0.25-2.35%) during the initial phase and one patient suffered a PE and three patients had a recurrent DVT during the follow-up period. A cost reduction of 2705529 Swedish crowns (34.5%) was achieved in this study compared with traditional in-patient treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin, administered subcutaneously, once daily, for the initial treatment of DVT yields large cost reductions and is well tolerated and effective in an outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9010387     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1996.81877000.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  15 in total

1.  Guidelines for anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  David K Cundiff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Routine home treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J Eikelboom; R Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

Review 3.  Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Richard Othieno; Emmanuel Okpo; Rachel Forster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-09

Review 4.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Once-daily enoxaparin in the outpatient setting versus unfractionated heparin in hospital for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Beng H Chong; Tim A Brighton; Ross I Baker; Peter Thurlow; Choon H Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Treatment of deep vein thrombosis: what factors determine appropriate treatment?

Authors:  James D Douketis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  K E Hauer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

Review 8.  Dalteparin sodium. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  C J Dunn; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications.

Authors:  Judith A O'Brien; Jaime J Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Denis Getsios; Ingrid Caro; Judith A O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.